Important Article
ICD: Coding Clinic for ICD-10, 2020 1Q pg 23
When a patient is diagnosed with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder assign only a code from category F31, Bipolar disorder. Bipolar disorder includes both depression and mania and it is more important to capture the bipolar disorder. A code for depression would not be separately reported.
ICD: Cologuard Test
Cologuard® Test Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2019: Page 32
Question: A patient underwent a colonoscopy because of a positive Cologuard® test. The colonoscopy demonstrated no abnormal findings. What is the appropriate diagnosis code for this encounter?
Answer: Assign code R19.5, Other fecal abnormalities, for the abnormal Cologuard® test findings. The Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting state, "For patients receiving diagnostic services only during an encounter/visit, sequence first the diagnosis, condition, problem, or other reason for encounter/visit shown in the medical record to be chiefly responsible for the outpatient services provided during the encounter/visit. Codes for other diagnoses (e.g., chronic conditions) may be sequenced as additional diagnoses."
Question: A patient is referred for a colonoscopy due to the positive results of a Cologuard® test. During colonoscopy, a cecal polyp was found and removed. The preoperative diagnosis is screening colonoscopy and abnormal Cologuard®. What is the ICD-10-CM code for the colonoscopy encounter?
Answer: Based on the documentation submitted, assign code K63.5, Polyp of colon, as the first-listed diagnosis for the colonoscopy. When a colonoscopy is performed due to a positive finding on a Cologuard® test, the colonoscopy would be considered a diagnostic examination, not a screening.
CPT: Laparoscopic Bilateral Total Lymphadenectomy
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, First Quarter 2021: Page 8
Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after March 17, 2021, unless otherwise noted.
Question 3: A patient with endometrial adenocarcinoma underwent a total laparoscopic robotic-assisted hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, sentinel lymph node mapping with indocyanine green (ICG), dissection of the sentinel and peri-aortic lymph nodes, omental and peritoneal biopsies, and pelvic washings. When only the sentinel lymph nodes are removed, is it appropriate to assign a code for a bilateral total lymphadenectomy? Is there a specific number of lymph nodes that need to be removed in order to assign CPT code 38572 to capture a bilateral total lymphadenectomy?
Answer : Based on the documentation submitted, assign CPT code 38570, ;Laparoscopy, surgical; with retroperitoneal lymph node sampling (biopsy), single or multiple, for the removal of the bilateral sentinel pelvic lymph nodes, with limited periaortic lymph node dissection. In addition, for facility reporting under Medicare's Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) and Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) payment systems, assign HCPCS Level II code C9756, Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence lymphatic mapping of lymph node(s) (sentinel or tumor draining) with administration of indocyanine green (ICG) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure), for the lymph node mapping with ICG.
For Non-Medicare beneficiaries, CPT code 38900, Intraoperative identification (eg, mapping) of sentinel lymph node(s) includes injection of non-radioactive dye, when performed (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure), is reported for the lymph node mapping.
As there is no way for the facility to indicate reduced services, it is not appropriate to report CPT code 38572, Laparoscopy, surgical; with bilateral total pelvic lymphadenectomy and peri-aortic lymph node sampling (biopsy), single or multiple, when the documentation does not support a bilateral total pelvic lymphadenectomy.
CPT: Stereotactic Computer-Assisted (Navigational) Procedures
CPT Assistant, July 2011, Volume 21, Issue 7, page 12 Code
61783 is reported for stereotactic computer-assisted (navigational) procedures for the spinal region.
A parenthetical note indicates that code 61783 should not be reported in conjunction with codes 63620 and 63621.
Coding Tip Do not report add-on code 20985, Computer-assisted surgical navigational procedure for musculoskeletal procedures, image-less (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure), in conjunction with codes 61781-61783.
Commonly Asked Questions
Question: Why use a stereotactic computer-assisted (navigational) procedure?
Answer: Severe degenerative disease, tumor, trauma, or spinal other deformity, inflammatory or neoplastic disorders can alter the normal anatomic landmarks, thereby increasing the difficulty or risk of surgical procedures. This technique enables the physician to better identify anatomy for precise treatments and reduce the likelihood of injury to vital structures.
Question:What documentation should be recorded in the medical record when add-on codes 61781, 61782, and 61783 are reported?
Answer: Codes 61781, 61782, and 61783 describe the target selection of a computerized device utilizing computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) intraoperative localization during brain, craniofacial, skull base, and spinal procedures. The documentation for the use of one of these codes should include the physician work of image-based planning, description of the image acquisition, attachment of a reference frame, registration and review of the image data sets, and verification of the accuracy. The physician work of image-based planning must also be included when reporting these codes. These add-on codes describing the physician work of stereotactic navigation in the extradural, intradural, and spinal regions are separately identifiable and reportable in addition to the primary procedure code and are not considered as bundled into the primary procedure code.
Question: What is involved in performing a stereotactic computer-assisted (navigational) procedure?
Answer: Codes 61781, 61782, and 61783 describe computer-assisted planning for stereotactic surgery. This planning may take a significant amount of physician time and work which includes target selection, planning of surgical trajectory, appraisal of critical structures within the surgical field, and correlation with relevant surgical anatomy inherent to the procedure at hand. Using a computer, various trajectories are determined to assist the physician in choosing the specific trajectory and calculating the entry point. Because these new codes are add-on codes, the stereotactic planning and three-dimensional navigational imaging services they describe are always performed as an adjunct to a primary cranial or spinal procedure, and they are used in an effort to enhance the safety and efficacy of existing techniques.
Question: What are the advantages of a stereotactic computer-assisted (navigational) procedure?
Answer: A stereotactic computer-assisted (navigational) procedure enables better visualization and allows the surgeon to plan and review the path of a surgical procedure prior to the procedure. The surgeon is able to create a virtual surgical plan and visualize the important structures at risk in the operative field in an effort to improve the accuracy of the procedure. The surgeon can often predict the surgical difficulties and risks that might be encountered and plan accordingly to decrease the likelihood of morbidity or complications. During the operation, this image-guidance can often decrease the risk of operative complications and reduce the operating time.
Question: When are codes 61781, 61782, and 61783 reported?
Answer: Code 61781 is reported when stereotactic computer-assisted navigation is used with primary procedures that are performed in the cranial, intradural region. Code 61782 is reported when performed in conjunction with otolaryngologic/head, and neck (craniofacial) procedures, including functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (FESS) and skull base resection codes. Examples include the procedures described by codes 31254-31256, 31267, 31276, 31287, 31288, 31290-31294, and 61548. Code 61783 is reported with primary procedures performed in the spinal region such as the placement of fixation devices requiring precision (eg, C1-C2 screws) or a complex tumor resection.
Question: Who reports stereotactic computer-assisted (navigational) procedures?
Answer: Neurosurgeons, otolaryngologists, orthopedists, and spine surgeons report codes 61781, 61782, and 61783 when this type of navigation is needed for the procedure and the patient.
Question: How many units of code 61782 may be reported during a single operative session involving multiple endoscopic sinus procedures?
Answer: CPT code 61782 is reported once per surgical session, regardless of the number of sinuses involved. The code includes planning, setup of the instrument, and its intraoperative use. CPT codes 61783 and 61784 are also reported only once per surgical session.
Question:Is it appropriate to report add-on code 61783 for navigation using an image-guided method (eg, Stealth Station™ navigation) with any of the spinal decompression codes (eg, 63030, 63042, or 63047)?
Answer: No. Code 61783 is not applicable for the spinal decompression codes (63030, 63042, and 63047) as it is not intended for decompression of degenerative spine disease or disc displacement. Code 61783 describes navigation in the spinal region using an image-guided method (including Stealth Station™) to identify anatomy for precise treatments and avoidance of vital structures. Examples of its use in the spine include the placement of fixation devices requiring precision (eg, C1-C2 screws) or a complex tumor resection. To further clarify, the application of the procedure described by code 61783 to the spine is to help identify anatomy and, more specifically, to aid with instrumentation placement or other complex procedures. Code 61783 is not to be reported with simple decompression codes (63001-63051).
ICD: Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Asthma
Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2017: Page 26
Coding advice or code assignments contained in this issue effective with discharges March 13, 2017.
Question: When a patient with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has an acute exacerbation of COPD, is the asthma reported as exacerbated or unspecified?
Answer: If the health record documentation is not clear whether the asthma is acutely exacerbated, query the provider for clarification. An exacerbation of COPD does not automatically make the asthma exacerbated.
CPT: Pelvic Floor Injections
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Second Quarter 2021: Page 9
Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after May 26, 2021, unless otherwise noted.
Question 8 : A patient with pelvic floor pain and pelvic floor muscle high-tone dysfunction was administered bilateral botulinum injections in the pelvic floor muscles. A bilateral pudendal block was given under finger guidance into the Alcock's canal. With a finger in the vagina to confirm location and depth of the injection, botulinum was injected into two locations in each obturator internus muscle bilaterally, followed by an injection into one location in each of the pubococcygeus, ileococcygeus, coccygeus and puborectalis muscles bilaterally. The provider has documented the injections as trigger point injections. However, when injecting a toxin such as botulinum, is it more appropriate to assign a code for chemodenervation from CPT code range 64642-64647? If so, would it be appropriate to assign CPT code 64646, Chemodenervation of trunk muscle(s); 1-5 muscle(s), to capture injections into the pelvic floor muscles?
Answer : Assign CPT code 20553, Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), 3 or more muscles, for the injection of botulinum into the pelvic floor muscles as the provider has specifically documented the procedure as trigger point injections. A trigger point injection targets the muscle to alleviate pain. Although botulinum is a toxin utilized in chemodenervation, it can be used for trigger point injections when the target is the muscle. In addition, report the number of units of botulinum administered with HCPCS Level II code J0585, Injection, onabotulinumtoxinA, 1 unit
CPT: Surgery: Musculoskeletal System, Botox Injection
CPT Assistant, July 2022, Volume 32, Issue 7, page 17
Question: Is it appropriate to report code 64642 for an injection of onabotulinumtoxin A (Botox) in the piriformis muscle?
Answer: No, code 64642, Chemodenervation of one extremity; 1-4 muscle(s), would not be appropriate to report for an injection of onabotulinumtoxin A in the piriformis muscle.
As stated in the August 2019 issue of CPT® Assistant (p 10): "Note that chemodenervation codes (64642-64645) are reported once per extremity, not per muscle or number of injections." Therefore, code 20552, Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), 1 or 2 muscle(s), would be the appropriate code to report.
Coding Clarification: Piriformis Muscle Injection Reporting
CPT Assistant, April 2012, Volume 22, Issue 4, page 19
In the December 2011 issue of the CPT Assistant (page 8), instruction in the article stated that sciatic nerve injection code 64445, Injection, anesthetic agent; sciatic nerve, single, should not be used to report a piriformis muscle injection.
However, from a CPT coding perspective, piriformis muscle injection(s) should be reported using CPT code 20552, ;Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), 1 or 2 muscle(s). For further clarification, should fluoroscopic guidance be performed, this is additionally reported using code 77002, Fluoroscopic guidance for needle placement (eg, biopsy, aspiration, injection, localization device.
CPT Assistant, May 2003, Volume 05, Issue 13, page 19
Surgery/Female Genital System, 58558, 58120 (Q&A)
Question: How should a hysteroscopy followed by a polypectomy and a D&C (not performed through the scope) be reported? The physician dilates the internal cervical os and a hysteroscope is inserted in the endometrial cavity. An examination through the scope is performed. After the scope is removed, multiple polypectomies are performed, as well as gentle curettage of the cavity walls. Should both codes 58558, Hysteroscopy surgical; with sampling (biopsy) of endometrium and/or polypectomy with or without D&C, and 58120, Dilation and curettage, diagnostic and/or therapeutic (nonobstetrical), be reported?
Please advise on the correct coding.
AMA Comment: Hysteroscopy followed by a polypectomy and D&C, which are not performed through the hysteroscope, should be reported with code 58558, Hysteroscopy surgical; with sampling (biopsy) of endometrium and/or polypectomy with our without D&C. It would not be appropriate to separately report codes 58558 and 58120, as code 58558 includes both.
CPT Assistant, September 2002, Volume 09, Issue 12, page 10
Female Genital System, 58558 (Q&A)
Question: What code should I report if a hysteroscopy is performed, and following removal of the hysteroscope, a polypectomy is performed?
AMA Comment Performance of a hysteroscopy followed by a polypectomy performed without the use of a scope should be reported with code 58558, Hysteroscopy, surgical; with sampling (biopsy) of endometrium and/or polypectomy, with or without D & C. A polypectomy may be performed through a scope or following the hysteroscopy without the use of a scope. Code 58558 is intended to be used to report either circumstance
Surgery: Hemic and Lymphatic Systems
CPT Assistant, June 2012, Volume 22, Issue 6, page 15
Question: What is the difference between CPT code 38510, Biopsy or excision of lymph node(s); open, deep cervical node(s), and code 38500, Biopsy or excision of lymph node(s); open, superficial?
Answer: Cervical lymph nodes are found in the neck. Code 38500 describes the excision of superficial cervical lymph node(s). The term "superficial" pertains to its physiologic proximity to the body surface at a given anatomic site relative to the skin.
For removal, biopsy, or dissection of a deep cervical node, the identification and/or avoidance of cranial nerves (VII, X, XI, XII) and large caliber vessels are crucial.
In regions where the platysma is not present (eg, suboccipital), a node deep to the fascia of that region would be considered "deep.”
ICD: Use of Additional Code for Condition of Unspecified Type Coding
Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Second Quarter 2021: Page 10
Question: An obese woman, who is 40 weeks gestation, had a normal delivery of a healthy infant. The provider noted "Obesity" in his final diagnostic statement. There is a note in the Tabular List instructing, "Use additional code to identify the type of obesity (E66.-)" under code O99.214, Obesity complicating childbirth. Since the type of obesity is not specified, would it be appropriate to only assign code O99.214, Obesity complicating childbirth, since code E66.9, Obesity, unspecified, does not describe a type of obesity?
Answer: Facilities may develop internal facility-specific coding policies, stipulating whether to report "unspecified" codes as additional codes, when more specific information is not documented and the unspecified code does not add any useful information.
Any internal facility-specific coding policies developed must be applied consistently to all health records coded.
For example, code O99.214, Obesity complicating childbirth, fully captures the diagnostic statement. Therefore, code E66.9, Obesity, unspecified, would not be needed as an additional code assignment, because "unspecified" is not a type of obesity and code E66.9 does not provide any additional information.
ICD :Body Mass Index
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Fourth Quarter 2018: Page 77
Question: The physician documents a diagnosis of obesity as a pregnancy complication and the patient's BMI is noted in the record. Is it appropriate to assign a code for the BMI documented on the delivery record?
Answer:No, do not assign codes for the body mass index (BMI) during pregnancy. Assign only code O99.214, Obesity complicating childbirth, with the specific obesity code from category E66-, Overweight and obesity, for obesity complicating delivery. Weight gain during pregnancy is evaluated differently, and is based on the mother's BMI before the pregnancy. Please note that effective October 1, 2018, the Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting for BMI codes have been revised. The revised guideline states, "Do not assign BMI codes during pregnancy.”
CPT: Surgery: Integumentary System
CPT Assistant, November 2020, Volume 30, Issue 11, page 12
Question: Is there a required number of lymph nodes that need to be removed when reporting code 19302?
Answer: No set number of lymph nodes must be removed to report code 19302, Mastectomy, partial (eg, lumpectomy, tylectomy, quadrantectomy, segmentectomy); with axillary lymphadenectomy. However, code 19302 requires a full dissection and not merely a sampling of a few nodes. A separate incision may or may not be required for the lymph node removal. A single incision may be used for the special circumstance in which the breast lesion is lateral, and the incision can be extended into the axilla. However, it is not the incision that makes the difference, but the extent of the axillary lymph node dissection. Based on the physician's physical examination, and other indicators about the likelihood that the cancer has spread to the lymph nodes, the surgeon will generally remove between 5 and 30 nodes during a traditional axillary dissection.
In order to report code 19302, the axillary lymphadenectomy should include (at a minimum) lymph nodes from Levels I and II.
There are three levels of axillary lymph nodes (the nodes in the underarm or axilla area):
-
Level I is inferior to the lower edge of the pectoralis minor muscle.
-
Level II is deep to the pectoralis minor muscle.
-
Level III is superior to the pectoralis minor muscle.
ICD: Acute Exacerbation of Unspecified Asthma with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Fourth Quarter 2017: Page 96
Question: Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2017, page 25, advised that for a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with asthma, only code J44.9, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, was sufficient and that code J45.909, Unspecified asthma, uncomplicated should not be assigned as "unspecified" isn't a type of asthma. Does the same hold true if the asthma is documented as an acute exacerbation?
Answer: Assign codes J44.9, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, and code J45.901, Unspecified asthma with (acute) exacerbation, for documented COPD with acute exacerbation of asthma. Although code J45.901 does not represent a type of asthma, it does provide additional specificity regarding the asthma being an acute exacerbation.
ICD: Asthma, Emphysema and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2019: Page 36
Question: A patient with emphysema presents due to asthma and COPD. When you reference asthma with COPD, the Index refers coding professionals to code J44.9, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified. However, COPD with emphysema is coded to J43.9, Emphysema, unspecified, per Coding Clinic Fourth Quarter 2017. Category J44, Other chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, includes asthma with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, so we feel this code is a better reflection of the patient's diagnosis. However, there is an Excludes1 note at J44 that prohibits the reporting of code J44.9 with J43.9. How should we report asthma in a patient with COPD and emphysema?
Answer: Assign code J43.9, Emphysema, unspecified, together with a specific asthma code from category J45, to fully convey the clinical diagnoses in this case. Since emphysema is a form of COPD, it is not appropriate to assign a code for "unspecified" COPD in addition to code J43.9. The advice previously published in Coding Clinic regarding COPD and emphysema was based on the current structure of the classification.
ICD: Malignant Pleural Effusion
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Third Quarter 2022: Page 14
Question: A patient was admitted with recurrent malignant pleural effusion, and thoracentesis with placement of a PleurX™ catheter was performed. Pleural fluid cytology was positive for cancer cells. The patient has a past history of left breast cancer and at that time underwent a lumpectomy. More recently, she was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast ER/PR positive, HER2 negative, and had a bilateral mastectomy. The patient also has known metastases to the cervical lymph nodes, liver and bone, and is on adjuvant Tamoxifen therapy. Would it be appropriate to assign code J91.0, Malignant pleural effusion, as the principal diagnosis? The instructional note at code J91.0 directs "Code first the underlying neoplasm."
Answer: No. It is not appropriate to assign code J91.0, Malignant pleural effusion, as principal diagnosis, because of the instructional note, "Code first underlying neoplasm." Assign code C50.912, Malignant neoplasm of unspecified site of left female breast, as the principal diagnosis since the patient is still receiving adjuvant treatment for the breast cancer. Assign codes J91.0, Malignant pleural effusion, C77.0, Secondary and unspecified malignant neoplasm of lymph nodes of head, face and neck, C78.7, Secondary malignant neoplasm of liver and intrahepatic bile duct, C79.51, Secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, Z17.0, Estrogen receptor positive status [ER+], and Z79.810, Long term (current) use of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), as additional diagnoses.
CPT: Perineal Urethroplasty
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Second Quarter 2021: Page 12
Question 14: A morbidly obese patient with a bulbar urethral stricture and existing supra pubic tube presents for perineal urethroplasty via partial urethrectomy with anastomosis. A perineal incision was made through fascia and muscle exposing the bulbar urethra which was dissected from the tendinous attachments to the corporal bodies. The urethra was transected at the level of the stricture. Once the scarred segment of the urethra was excised, the distal urethra and proximal bulbar urethra were mobilized and both ends were brought together with sutures to secure the area of anastomosis. Fibrillar material was placed into the surgical wound for hemostasis. What are the correct code(s) for an urethroplasty with partial urethrectomy and anastomosis?
Answer : Assign CPT code 53415, ;Urethroplasty, transpubic or perineal, 1-stage, for reconstruction or repair of prostatic or membranous urethra, for a perineal urethroplasty. The urethrectomy is included in code 53415. Therefore, no additional codes are assigned.
ICD: Degenerative Joint Disease of Sacroiliac Joint
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Second Quarter 2020: Page 14
Question:A patient is diagnosed with bilateral lower sacroiliac degenerative joint disease (DJD). When referencing the Index to Diseases under Degenerative, joint disease, ICD-10-CM directs the coding professional to see "Osteoarthritis." However, the Index to Diseases does not specifically classify osteoarthritis (OA) of the sacroiliac joint. What is the appropriate code assignment for bilateral lower sacroiliac degenerative joint disease (DJD)?
Answer: Assign code M46.1, Sacroiliitis, not elsewhere classified. DJD of the sacroiliac joint is caused by degeneration, leading to inflammation of the sacroiliac joint. Currently, the ICD-10-CM does not have a unique code for DJD of the sacroiliac joint; therefore, code M46.1 is the closest available alternative. The National Centers for Health Statistics has agreed to consider a future ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance (C&M) proposal for creation of a new code for DJD/osteoarthritis of the sacroiliac joint.
CPT: September 1997 page 1
Coding Skin Grafts CPT Assistant, September 1997, Volume 09, Issue 7, pages 1-3
Derma-fascia-fat grafts (code 15770) are used in a similar manner as the composite grafts in that part of the purpose is to blend-in blemishes or defects left behind by surgical excisions, atrophy, and other fleshy "stand-outs." The tissue used for the graft can be a continuous portion (containing all three of the layered components), individual parts (grafted layer by layer), or inserted in combination (such as a fascia-fat layer, later covered by a dermal layer). The pockets and defects of the recipient area are therefore restored to their normal positioning as closely as possible. This code is reported once per graft site.
CPT: Coding Brief: Coding for Breast Surgery
CPT Assistant, March 2015, Volume 25, Issue 3, page 5
Question: Why are there two separate codes to report breast cancer operations with sentinel node biopsy and one unified code for mastectomy or lumpectomy with axillary node dissection?
Answer: The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for breast surgery were developed when axillary dissection was standard therapy for breast cancer. Modified radical mastectomy is reported with code 19307, while lumpectomy with axillary dissection is reported with code 19302. When coding for sentinel lymph node biopsy was developed, the code needed to apply to both breast and melanoma procedures. Code 38900, Intraoperative identification (eg, mapping) of sentinel lymph node(s) includes injection of non-radioactive dye, when performed (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure), is an add-on code to be used with any lymph node biopsy or lymphadenectomy code to indicate the intraoperative work done to identify the sentinel lymph node(s). Therefore, when lumpectomy with sentinel node biopsy is performed, this is reported using codes 19301, 38525-51, and 38900. Code 38525 is reported for the biopsy of the node(s). When total mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy is performed, codes 19303, 38525 with modifier 51 (reported for the biopsy of the lymph nodes), and add-on code 38900 are reported.
Question:When a total mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy is performed, I obtain a frozen section of the nodes and proceed to dissect the axilla if the nodes are positive. Can I report the axillary node biopsy separately?
Answer: No. This would be reported with the code for the modified radical mastectomy (19307) and add-on code 38900, Intraoperative identification (eg, mapping) of sentinel lymph node(s) includes injection of non-radioactive dye, when performed (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure), would be reported for the sentinel node mapping procedure. It would not be appropriate to report the axillary node biopsy separately from the axillary dissection.
Question:Can I code for injection of radioactive tracer and blue dye for sentinel lymph node biopsy?
Answer: If you inject radioactive tracer preoperatively, report code 38792. Injection of blue dye, when performed, is included in the sentinel node code, 38900.
Question: I perform ultrasound-guided core biopsies but do not leave localization devices in the biopsy location. Should I use codes 19083 and 19084?
Answer:Yes. All of the image-guided biopsy codes, 19081-19086, specify that the biopsy is inclusive of the placement of breast localization devices, including clips and metallic pellets, when performed, and imaging of the biopsy specimen, when performed. In other words, clip placement or specimen imaging cannot be reported separately, but the image-guided biopsy code is appropriate for the biopsy regardless if clip placement or specimen imaging is performed.
CPT: Coding Brief: Coding for Breast Surgery
CPT Assistant, March 2015, Volume 25, Issue 3, page 5
Question: Do you code differently for excision with multiple wires for localization than excision with one wire?
Answer: No. The new image-guided localization codes are per lesion, not per wire. Thus, multiple wires may be placed to identify any lesion, however, this would be reported the same as for placing a single wire. An excision through a single incision may only be reported once, regardless of the number of wires used for the localization.
Question: How do you code for excision of additional tissue for margins at the time of lumpectomy? Is there a code for the added work of orienting and inking margins?
Answer:CPT codes 19120 and 19125 are used for excision of breast lesions in which attention to surgical margins and assurance of complete tumor resection is unnecessary. For oncologic resection with attention to margins (lumpectomy or partial mastectomy), code 19301 describes the procedure in which margin status is indicated by any method, which may include excision of additional surrounding tissue for margins. As a corollary, code 19301 is reported whether the breast cancer is palpable or removed with preoperative placement of a localization wire.
Question: How do you code re-excision of a lumpectomy cavity when you must return for positive margins on final pathology a week after a lumpectomy?
Answer: Use code 19301 for lumpectomy with modifier 58, Staged or related procedure or service by the same physician or other qualified health care professional during the postoperative period, appended. Indicate in the operative report that this procedure is a planned return to the operating room for more extensive work.
Question: How should I code for nipple-sparing mastectomy and skin-sparing mastectomy to distinguish them from total mastectomy?
Answer: All of these procedures are classified mastectomy for cancer and should all be reported with code 19303. No special distinctions are made for the type of incision. The operative report should use state "total nipple-sparing" or "total skin-sparing" mastectomy to avoid confusion with a subcutaneous mastectomy.
Question: How do you code for ablation of breast lesions with cryotherapy, microwave, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or laser?
Answer: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not specifically approved cryotherapy, microwave, RFA, or laser devices for ablative treatment of breast cancer. There are no specific codes for these types of procedures and, therefore, they would be reported with code 19499, Unlisted procedure breast. When reporting an unlisted code to describe a procedure or service, it will be necessary to submit supporting documentation (eg, a procedure report) along with the claim to provide an adequate description of the nature, extent, and need for the procedure, as well as the time, effort, and equipment necessary to provide the service.
Coding Clarification: Trigger Point Injections Using "Dry Needling" Technique
CPT Assistant, October 2014, Volume 24, Issue 10, page 9
Dry needling (DN) is a technique in which a thin filiform needle is used to penetrate the skin and stimulate underlying myofascial trigger points, muscular, and connective tissues. The technique is used to treat dysfunctions in skeletal muscle, fascia, and connective tissue, diminish persistent peripheral nociceptive input, and reduce or restore impairments of body structure and function which may lead to an individual's improved daily activity.
Prior to 2002, CPT code 20550, Injection(s); single tendon sheath, or ligament, aponeurosis (eg, plantar "fascia"), was used to report injections of various anatomic sites (ie, tendon sheath, ligament, ganglion, trigger point). However, as new techniques emerged for performing trigger point services, there was some confusion regarding the appropriate reporting of trigger point injections when a "dry needle" technique is used. Consequently, in the June 1998 issue of the CPT Assistant newsletter (p 10), the following frequently asked question was published to address proper reporting of trigger point injections using a "dry needle" technique.
Question: My physician performs a trigger-point injection using a "dry needle" (a syringe which does not contain an injectable). Can I still use 20550, or should another code be reported?
Answer: The intent of code 20550 is to identify the procedure of performing the trigger-point injection itself. The supply of the injectable is reported separately, using an appropriate HCPCS code to identify the specific injectable used. Since the injectable supply is not included as part of the 20550 procedure, if a "dry needle" technique is used, code 20550 may be used to identify the procedure performed. For the 2002 CPT® code set, codes 20551, Injection(s); single tendon origin/insertion, 20552, Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), 1 or 2 muscle(s), and 20553, Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), 3 or more muscle(s), were established to differentiate the techniques associated with multiple muscle group injections for trigger points. In addition, code 20550 was revised to describe only injections of a tendon sheath, ligament, or ganglion cyst, thus excluding trigger point(s). Due to this revision of code 20550, confusion remained regarding the reporting of trigger point injections using a "dry needle" technique. To clarify proper reporting of trigger point services performed using a "dry needle" technique, an article was published in the September 2003 issue of CPT Assistant, stating that codes from the (20550-20553) code range are not intended for reporting a "dry needle" technique, and that dry needling techniques may be reported with the unlisted procedure code 20999, Unlisted procedure, musculoskeletal system, general.
Surgery: Integumentary System
CPT Assistant December 2007, Volume 17, Issue 12, page 7-8
Question: The patient had a re-excision of her lumpectomy site along with a sentinel node biopsy. The physician removed two lymph nodes through an axillary incision. The procedure report notes that the lumpectomy cavity was opened and the entire inferior margin was excised from the anterior surface of the lumpectomy cavity to the posterior. Is it appropriate to report the re-excision with code 19302, Mastectomy, partial (eg, lumpectomy, tylectomy, quadrantectomy, segmentectomy); with axillary lymphadenectomy?
Also, if no lymph nodes were excised and only a re-excision of the lumpectomy site was performed, is it appropriate to report code 19301, Mastectomy, partial (eg, lumpectomy, tylectomy, quadrantectomy, segmentectomy)?
Answer: The re-excision of breast tissue is reported with code 19301. Codes 38500, Biopsy or excision of lymph node(s); open, superficial, and 38525, Biopsy or excision of lymph node(s); open, deep axillary node(s), may be reported for the sentinel node excision, as appropriate. If the two nodes are superficial axillary nodes, code 38500 is reported. If the two nodes are deep axillary nodes, code 38525 is reported. If the surgeon performs an injection procedure for node identification, code 38792 is also reported. Additionally, because the procedure is clinically likely to occur within the usual postoperative period, modifier 58 should be appended to indicate that this is a related procedure by the same physician during the postoperative period. It would not be appropriate to report code 19302 because the sentinel node biopsy is not an "axillary lymphadenectomy" (ie, not an axillary node dissection).
CPT: Coding Brief: Partial Mastectomy/Lumpectomy and Axillary Lymphadenectomy -
19301, 19302, 38500, 38525
CPT Assistant September 2008, Volume 18, Issue 9, pages 5
Question #6: If both deep and superficial axillary nodes are sampled through one incision, are both codes 38500 and 38525 reported?
AMA Response: No, the deep excision (code 38525) includes any superficial node excision or biopsy when performed at the same setting though the same incision.
CPT: Reporting Pelvic Floor Trigger Point Injections for Pain Management
CPT Assistant, October 2021, Volume 31, Issue 10, page 8
20552 ;Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), 1 or 2 muscle(s)
20553 ;Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), 3 or more muscles
(Do not report 20552, 20553 in conjunction with 20560, 20561 for the same muscle[s])
The pelvic floor is a grouping of muscles, ligaments, and tissues found in the floor (the base) of the pelvis that are encased within the pelvic bones. The muscles attach to the front, back, and sides of the pelvis, as well as to the lowest part of the spine, called the sacrum. The function of the pelvic floor is to support the organs within the pelvis: bladder, rectum, urethra, uterus, vagina, and prostate. In addition, pelvic floor muscles have several important functions related to bowel control, bladder control, and sexual function.
Patients with pelvic floor dysfunction may have especially tight or weak pelvic floor muscles. When the muscles spasm or tighten, a patient may have trouble urinating or passing stool. When the muscles weaken, the organs within the pelvis may drop and press down on the rectum and bladder.
A trigger point is an area of highly sensitive soft tissue within a muscle or around muscles that may cause pain and tenderness. Trigger points may be a source of pain in any part of the pelvic floor and cause the affected muscle(s) not to function properly. The trigger point is often described as a painful knot or tight band of muscle fiber. When a healthy muscle is active, the muscle will contract and relax. The problem arises in damaged muscle tissue when the muscle ceases to relax and begins to form a knot(s) or tight band(s) of muscle fibers. Upon examination, a physician or other qualified health care professional (QHP) may detect the knot(s) or tight band(s) by palpating the affected area. In more severe cases, the knot(s) or band(s) may cause blood flow to become constricted within a muscle or muscle group.
Myofascial pain syndrome is a subtype of chronic pelvic pain defined by short, tight pelvic floor muscles with hypersensitive trigger points. Myofascial pain commonly presents with symptoms of overactive bladder, dyspareunia, or constipation, as well as burning, aching, clenching, or feelings of heaviness. The trigger point injection targets the muscle to alleviate pain. For trigger point injection for myofascial pain of the pelvis muscles, CPT codes 20552 and 20553 may be reported, as appropriate. If the injection is for chemodenervation (a process that alleviates pain by blocking nerve signals to the muscles) of the pelvic floor using a toxin, it may also be reported with codes 20552 and 20553, as appropriate.
Note that the pelvic floor muscles are not considered trunk muscles; therefore, it would not be appropriate to report code 64646, Chemodenervation of trunk muscle(s); 1-5 muscle(s), or 64647, Chemodenervation of trunk muscle(s); 6 or more muscles, for chemodenervation injections into the pelvic floor muscles.
CPT: Surgery: Integumentary System
CPT Assistant February 2008, Volume 18, Issue 2, pages 8 -9
Question: What is the difference between an incision and drainage procedure and an aspiration procedure?
Answer: From a CPT coding perspective, an incision must be performed in order for an incision and drainage procedure to be reported; an aspiration procedure does not involve an incision. For example, an abscess formation may be drained by making an incision through the skin or mucosa in close proximity and into the abscess formation. The contents of the abscess are then removed (ie, drained) through the incision. For an aspiration procedure, the contents of the area to be aspirated are generally approached by inserting a needle and the contents are drawn into a syringe. Dorland's Medical Dictionary defines aspiration as removal by suction (eg, excess fluid or gas from a body cavity or of a specimen for biopsy).
CPT: Coding Update: Neurostimulators, Analysis-Programming
CPT Assistant, July 2016, Volume 26, Issue 7, page 7
Simple intraoperative or subsequent programming of the neurostimulator pulse generator/transmitter (95971) includes changes to three or fewer of the following parameters: rate; pulse amplitude; pulse duration; pulse frequency; eight or more electrode contacts; cycling; stimulation train duration; train spacing; number of programs; number of channels; alternating electrode polarities; dose time (stimulation parameters changing in time periods of minutes, including dose-lockout times); and more than one clinical feature (eg, rigidity, dyskinesia, tremor). On the other hand, complex intraoperative or subsequent programming (95972, 95974, 95975, 95978, and 95979) includes changes to more than three of the above. Codes 95974 and 95978, which are reported for the first hour of electronic analysis, requires the use of modifier 52 for analysis that is less than 31 minutes in duration.
In addition, code 95973 was identified by the American Medical Association/Specialty Society Relative Value Scale (RVS) Update Committee (RUC) Relativity Assessment Workgroup (RAW) as a code whose Medicare utilization has increased significantly. Upon review of the increased use of the code, it was found that the service as described by the code descriptor was not being reported accurately. As a result, add-on code 95973 was deleted because the findings identified that the time needed to report this service is not necessary. In addition, the codes used to report these services also do not need to reflect time within the descriptors. Therefore, code 95972 was revised to conform with current practice, and the time component was removed.
CPT: Neurostimulators, Analysis-Programming Services Changes in 2019
CPT Assistant, February 2019, Volume 29, Issue 2, page 6 Guidelines
Revisions to the guidelines within the Neurostimulators, Analysis-Programming subsection clarify that electronic analysis involves documenting baseline settings, system programming parameters and electrode impedance, as well as establishing the functionality of the device prior to programming. Programming involves temporarily adjusting the system parameter(s) to the optimal settings to treat the patient's condition. The adjustments to the final program parameters selected and set after the programming session may or may not differ from the initial starting values.
When a neurostimulator or its components is implanted, electronic analysis is inherently included as part of the implantation procedure. Therefore, a parenthetical note was added listing the implantation codes that may not be reported in conjunction with code 95970 during the same operative session as the placement procedure. When subsequently interrogated at another session, code 95970 should be used to report electronic analysis when no programming is involved in the service.
Editorial revisions were also made to existing codes 95971 and 95972 to clarify that these codes should be used to report the electronic analysis and programming of spinal cord or peripheral nerve (eg, sacral nerve) neurostimulators, and specifies that these services are performed by a physician or other qualified health care professional (QHP).
Editorial revisions to this code set include a shift from time-based codes to parameter-based codes for electronic analysis and programming of cranial nerve neurostimulators. Codes 95974 and 95975, which were previously reported based on the length of programming time, were deleted. New codes 95976 and 95977 describe electronic analysis and programming of cranial nerve neurostimulators and are differentiated based on the number of parameters adjusted (simple vs complex). For purposes of counting the number of parameters being programmed, a single parameter that is adjusted two or more times during a programming session counts as one parameter.
Simple and complex programming are defined as follows:
Simple programming of a neurostimulator pulse generator/transmitter includes adjustment of one to three parameter(s). Complex programming includes adjustment of more than three parameters.
CPT: Reporting Dry Needling Technique
CPT Assistant, February 2020, Volume 30, Issue 2, page 9
Clinical Example (20560)
A 38-year-old female presents with diffuse right-shoulder myofascial pain.
Description of Procedure (20560)
Physician or other qualified health care professional palpates and locates the trigger points to be needled. Secure the first muscle between the fingers of the nonneedling hand. Insert sterile, single-use, solid-filament needles, varying from 32 to 38 gauge and 25 to 100 mm in length, at various depths and angles to achieve the desired result of releasing tight tissue, improving microcirculation, and removing neuronoxious chemicals. Make interactive reassessments throughout the procedure, noting needle fibrillation, local twitch response, and/or reproduction of symptoms, including but not limited to achiness, burning, and electricity. Repeat this process for each additional muscle to be treated. Withdraw the needles and apply pressure (hemostasis) directly to the skin over the needle-insertion site.
Clinical Example (20561)
A 38-year-old female presents with neck pain, muscle-tension headaches, and diffuse right-shoulder myofascial pain.
Description of Procedure (20561)
The physician or other qualified health care professional palpates and locates the trigger points to be needled. Secure the first muscle between the fingers of the nonneedling hand. Insert sterile, single-use, solid-filament needles, varying from 32 to 38 gauge and 25 to 100 mm in length, at various depths and angles to achieve the desired result of releasing tight tissue, improving microcirculation, and removing neuronoxious chemicals. Make interactive reassessments throughout the procedure, noting needle fibrillation, local twitch response, and/or reproduction of symptoms, including but not limited to achiness, burning, and electricity. Repeat this process for each additional muscle to be treated. Withdraw the needles and apply pressure (hemostasis) directly to the skin over the needle-insertion site.
CPT: Surgery: Endocrine System
CPT Assistant, January 2017, Volume 27, Issue 1, page 7
Question: Is it appropriate to report CPT code 60512, Parathyroid autotransplantation (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure), in addition to the primary procedure when the transplant site is in the neck (eg, sternocleidomastoid muscle) and performed through the same neck incision as the primary procedure, even if the transplant is into adjacent tissue?
Answer: No, it is not appropriate to report add-on code 60512 if the implantation is through the same neck incision as the primary procedure. This add-on code is only intended to be reported in instances when the implantation is performed at a distant site through a separate incision.
CPT: Total Thyroidectomy with Central Neck Dissection
Coding Clinic for HCPCS Fourth Quarter 2011 Page: 1
Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after January 31, 2012 unless otherwise noted.
QUESTION #2 Patient has papillary thyroid carcinoma and presents for a total thyroidectomy with central neck dissection, reimplantation of parathyroid into the strap muscle, direct and flexible laryngoscopies were performed at the beginning and end of the surgery, and bilateral cranial nerve EMG monitoring tubes. We are considering reporting CPT codes 60252, 60512, and 31575. However, we are not sure if the central neck dissection would be considered a bilateral procedure. Since CPT code 60252 includes limited neck dissection, would this be an appropriate code in this scenario? What codes should be assigned for the total thyroidectomy with the central neck dissection and the parathyroid reimplantation? Can the laryngoscopy be reported as an additional code?
Answer: Assign CPT codes 60252, Thyroidectomy, total or subtotal for malignancy; with limited neck dissection, and 60512, Parathyroid autotransplantation (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure), for the procedures performed. CPT code 31575, Laryngoscopy, flexible fiberoptic; diagnostic, was performed to reconfirm vocal cord mobility and considered inherent to the procedural process and would not be reported separately.
CPT: Injection of Amniofix
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Fourth Quarter 2018: Page 7
Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after December 24, 2018, unless otherwise noted.
QUESTION 3 :A patient with Achilles tendinosis received an injection of Amniofix to the left Achilles tendon. Based on the operative report the Amniofix was reconstituted with injectable saline and then injected into the Achilles tendon.What would be the appropriate CPT or HCPCS code be for this procedure?
Answer: There is no specific CPT or HCPCS code for the Amniofix injection performed. Report CPT code 20551, Injection(s); single tendon origin/insertion, for the Amniofix injection into the Achilles tendon.
Please note, the reporting of CPT codes 20550, Injection(s); single tendon sheath, or ligament, aponeurosis (e.g., plantar "fascia"), or 20551, is dependent on the needle placement not the substance injected.
Surgery: Integumentary System
CPT Assistant, September 2021, Volume 31, Issue 9, page 13
Question: May code 19380 (revision of reconstructed breast) be reported with code 11970 (replacement of tissue expander with permanent implant)? Physicians or other QHPs often perform extensive revisions to skin and capsules during this stage of implant reconstruction to reduce the number of revisional surgeries for breast reconstruction patients. Is it correct that code 19380 may only be reported with code 11970 when revisions are performed after the final implant is in place, based on how reconstructed breast is interpreted in the CPT 2021 code set?
Answer:Yes, it would be appropriate to report code 19380, Revision of reconstructed breast (eg, significant removal of tissue, re-advancement and/or re-inset of flaps in autologous reconstruction or significant capsular revision combined with soft tissue excision in implant-based reconstruction), with code 11970, Replacement of tissue expander with permanent implant, if extensive capsular revision and soft tissue revisions are performed. Minor capsule and/or soft tissue work is included in code 11970, which is consistent with the work of code 19342, Insertion or replacement of breast implant on separate day from mastectomy. Extensive revisions to the capsule at the time of the tissue expander to implant exchange would be reported separately with code 19370, Revision of peri-implant capsule, breast, including capsulotomy, capsulorrhaphy, and/or partial capsulectomy, in addition to code 11970 or 19342. If extensive capsule and extensive soft tissue work is performed (eg, not simply revising the scar or removing a minor amount of skin), report code 19380 instead of code 19370, because the work of code 19370 is included in code 19380, and code 19380 should be reported in addition to code 11970 or 19342
Surgery: Integumentary System, Breast Implant vs Tissue Expander
CPT Assistant, September 2022, Volume 32, Issue 9, page 18
Question:Please clarify the intent of code 19342 as it relates to the answer provided to a Frequently Asked Question in the September 2021 issue of CPT® Assistant. Under what circumstance would code 19342 be reported other than for cases of implant-to-implant exchange?
Answer: The phrase "breast implant" in the descriptor of code 19342, Insertion or replacement of breast implant on separate day from mastectomy, represents either a silicone gel- or saline-filled breast implant used to provide volume to a breast or reconstructed breast mound. Code 19342 is not intended to be reported for the placement of a tissue expander (19357) or another device (eg, radiation spacer, artificial space filler, etc). Code 19342 should be reported under the following situations:
For delayed breast reconstruction (ie, a mastectomy was previously performed on a different date) with the primary placement of a silicone gel- or saline-filled breast implant. For the replacement of a previously placed breast implant (which is typically performed after mastectomy as indicated in the descriptor but would also be appropriate in a congenital anomaly with unilateral lack of a breast or traumatic loss of the breast) if that is the only procedure from the 193XX code family reported for that breast. Code 19342 includes any minor revisions to the breast capsule and/or soft tissue (eg, scar revision).
If extensive capsule work is performed, and either the previous implant or a new implant of the same size and shape as the previous implant is placed, the surgeon would only report code 19370, Revision of peri-implant capsule, breast, including capsulotomy, capsulorrhaphy, and/or partial capsulectomy, because the removal and replacement of an implant is essential to any capsule revision. However, if a differently sized and/or shaped implant is also placed as part of the same extensive capsule revision procedure, it would be appropriate to report code 19342 in conjunction with code 19370 because of the increased work of resizing the breast implant. If extensive capsule revision and extensive soft-tissue revisions are performed, that work is reported with code 19380, Revision of reconstructed breast (eg, significant removal of tissue, re-advancement and/or re-insert of flaps in autologous reconstruction or significant capsular revision combined with soft tissue excision in implant-based reconstruction). (The work described by code 19370 is considered bundled within the work described by code 19380 for the same breast.)
If the replacement of the previous implant or a new implant of the same size and shape as the previous implant is performed, it is not separately reported. However, if a differently sized and/or shaped implant is placed as part of the same procedure, it would be appropriate to report code 19342 in conjunction with code 19380 because of the increased work of resizing the breast implant. If a tissue expander is being replaced with a breast implant, that procedure is appropriately reported with code 11970, Replacement of tissue expander with permanent implant, under all current circumstances. The concurrent reporting of either code 19370 or code 19380 during a tissue expander-to-breast implant exchange procedure would follow the same logic as outlined in the previous two scenarios related to code 19342.
The Breast Repair and/or Reconstruction subsection guidelines state that both codes 11970 and 19370 may be reported when extensive capsule work is performed, which allows for more accurate reporting when a tissue expander is replaced with an implant. In cases of previous breast augmentation with an implant (typically these would be aesthetic cases but are also performed as a symmetry procedure for patients with breast cancer reconstruction or other rare situations), code 19325, Breast augmentation with implant, would be used to report the replacement of an implant instead of code 19342.
Clarification: Breast Revision Procedures
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Fourth Quarter 2022: Page 17
Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after December 6, 2022, unless otherwise noted.
The Central Office has received a request for clarification of the advice published in Coding Clinic for HCPCS Fourth Quarter 2020, Pages 1-3, on breast reconstruction when compared to the advice published in CPT Assistant September 2022 Pages 18-19.
Coding advice for breast reconstructions has evolved since the publication of Coding Clinic for HCPCS Fourth Quarter 2020. In light of updated breast reconstruction guidance published in the September issue CPT Assistant, the previous Coding Clinic for HCPCS advice has changed.
The coding updates are as follows:
CPT code 19380, Revision of reconstructed breast (eg, significant removal of tissue, re-advancement and/or re-inset of flaps in autologous reconstruction or significant capsular revision combined with soft tissue excision in implant-based reconstruction), is appropriately assigned when documentation supports extensive breast capsule revision in addition to extensive soft-tissue revisions on the same breast. This includes when performed during a second stage breast reconstruction. CPT code 19342, Insertion or replacement of breast implant on separate day from mastectomy, is assigned in addition to code 19380 only when documentation supports there is extensive breast capsule revision, extensive soft-tissue revisions on the same breast and additional work necessary due to resizing of the breast implant (different size, different shape). CPT code 19342, may be reported in addition to CPT code 19370, ;Revision of peri-implant capsule, breast, including capsulotomy, capsulorrhaphy, and/or partial capsulectomy, only when provider documentation supports additional work was necessary due to resizing of the breast implant (different size, different shape) in addition to the extensive capsule revision. Replacement of an implant of the same size and shape (previous or new) is not reported separately from the primary procedure. This updated coding guidance supersedes the advice in Fourth Quarter 2020, Pages 1-3. Coding professionals should be guided by the most current coding advice.
CPT: Coding Clarification: Removal of Orthopedic Fixation (Codes 20670 and 20680)
CPT Assistant June 2009, Volume 19, Issue 6, page 7
Removal of Hardware
When the fracture is stable or healed, all forces are borne by the bone. At this point, the external fixation is no longer needed and can be safely removed. Subsequent casting, bracing, or surgery may also follow the removal of external fixation. CPT codes 20690-20697 relate to the application, adjustment and removal, of an external fixation system. CPT code 20694, Removal, under anesthesia, of external fixation system, would be appropriately reported only when anesthesia is required to perform removal of the external fixator system. Removal of the external fixator performed without anesthesia is not a separately reportable procedure because local infiltration of medication(s), anesthetic or contrast agent before, during, or at the conclusion of the procedure is an inclusive service of codes 20670, 20680, and 20690.
Code 20680, Removal of implant; deep (eg, buried wire, pin, screw, metal band, rod or plate), describes a unit of service that is reported only once provided the original injury is located on one site, regardless of the number of screws, plates, rods or incisions. An example would be the removal of a single implant system, which may call for "stab" or multiple incisions (eg, intramedullary (IM) nail and several locking bolts). Multiple use of code 20680 would be appropriate only when the hardware removal was performed for another fracture in a different anatomical site unrelated to the first fracture (eg, ankle and humerus). In these circumstances, modifier 59, Distinct procedural service, would be appended to subsequent uses of the code. For example, two different and noncontiguous implants are removed from two different bones or two different (noncontiguous) sites on the same bone using multiple incisions. Depending on whether the implants were superficial or deep, code 20680 may be reported twice or codes 20680 and 20670, Removal of implant; superficial (eg, buried wire, pin, or rod (separate procedure), may each be reported. If there was an extraordinary amount of work, or unusual effort involved in the removal (eg, bone buried screws or an exceptional scar), then modifier 22, Increased procedural services, may be appended to the code for the procedure and submitted with the usual accompanying documentation.
Examples of Use of Codes 20670 and 20680 To assist coders in discerning whether to use code 20670 or 20680, the following examples discuss a single implant, single and multiple fracture treatment, and specific products. Removal of Deep or Superficial Bimalleolar Plate and Screws Code 20680 would be used to describe the removal of a plate (eg, periarticular plate, locking plate, or one-third tubular plate) and screws from the fibula in a healed bimalleolar ankle fracture. If deep buried medial malleolar screws are removed from the tibia's medial malleolus at the same session, use code 20680. If removing superficial screws from the fibular fracture, code 20670 should be reported. If superficial screws are removed from the tibia's medial malleolus at the same session, the procedure is reported using code 20670 with modifier 59 appended. Removal of Plate and IM Nail and Interlocking Screws - Proximal Tibial Plateau and Tibial Shaft Fractures (Noncontiguous Fractures) During the same surgical session, if a plate and its associated screws are removed from a healed proximal tibial plateau fracture, and an IM nail with its interlocking screws are removed through a separate skin or fascial incision from a healed tibial shaft fracture where both implant systems were used in the same tibial bone for noncontiguous fractures, report code 20680 for one of the implant systems (eg, plate and screws) and code 20680 with modifier 59 appended for the other implant system removal (eg, IM nail and screws). Recognize that the plate and all of its associated screws can be removed through one long extensile incision, or the plate and some screws may be removed through a smaller, less-invasive incision, with the remaining screws being removed through smaller stab incisions. In either instance, code 20680 should be reported only once for the plate and screw system removal. Also recognize that IM nail systems (ie, nail and interlocking screws) cannot be removed through one extensile incision, but are routinely removed through a larger incision for IM nail removal and one or more smaller incisions for removal of one or more interlocking screws. Therefore, code 20680 should be reported only once for the removal of the IM nail and any or all of the interlocking screws when performed on the same day by the same physician. Removal of Separate Plate/Screw Systems - Both Bone Forearm Fracture Code 20680 is reported once for each bone when removing internal fixation of healing fractures of "both bones" (radius and ulna) of the forearm when each bone is treated with separate plates and screws. If the plate and screw system is removed from the ulna at the same session as the radius, code 20680 with modifier 59 appended is reported. These plates may be described by size (eg, small fragment system or small fragment plate) or by a trademark or type (eg, locking plate, periarticular plate, or polyaxial locking plate). Alternatively, the hardware may be described by the name of the manufacturer. Each plate and screw system removal procedure would be reported separately using code 20680 with modifier 59 appended to denote distinct procedural services (eg, different site or separate incision) performed on the same day by the same physician. Removal of any and all screws used for each fixation system (ie, one plate and its associated screws) is part of the service of the plate removal.
Removal of Buried Screw
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Fourth Quarter 2004 Page: 9
Question 3: We are concerned with the overuse of modifier 59. Some of our coders feel that modifier 59 should not be reported unless you get a CCI edit and others contend that whenever modifier 59 is warranted, even if it is obvious that the two procedures are separate, you would append modifier 59. When reporting the removal of a buried screw in two different areas, (arm and leg), would it be appropriate to report CPT code 20680 twice with a modifier 59?
Answer: It would be appropriate to report code 20680, Removal of implant; deep, twice for the removal of a buried screw in two different areas. Append modifier 59 to the second CPT code to identify that the two procedures are separate from each other. Modifier 59 should only be appended to the CPT code(s) when reporting multiple procedures that would normally be denied if billed together but due to particular circumstances the CPT code(s) are deemed appropriate.
Exchange of Hardware
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, First Quarter 2010 Page: 6
Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after March 15, 2010 unless otherwise noted.
QUESTION #15 A patient who underwent an ankle fusion previously was seen at our facility with areas of localized tenderness of the medial ankle. Work-up revealed a prominent screw head as the cause of the localized tenderness. A decision was made to remove the screw and exchange it with a shorter screw. What are the appropriate code assignments for this scenario?
ANSWER Presently, there is no CPT code for exchange of hardware. Therefore, report CPT code 20680, Removal of implant; deep (eg, buried wire, pin, screw, metal band, nail, rod or plate, for removal of the screw from the medial ankle. CPT code 27899, Unlisted procedure, leg or ankle, would be reported for the insertion of the shorter screw. HCPCS CODING CLINIC.
Bone Grafting of Femur and Tibial Tunnels
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Third Quarter 2020: Page 11
Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after September 17, 2020, unless otherwise noted.
Question 11 :A patient with a left knee anterior cruciate ligament tear, torn lateral meniscus and retained hardware from a previous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction presented for a left knee arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair, open removal of retained hardware and bone grafting of the distal femur and tibial tunnels.
Following the arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair, a tibial incision was made through subcutaneous tissue to access the tibial tunnel in order to remove the deep hardware. Guide pins were placed in the tibial tunnel and next putty and dowels (grafts) were placed in the tibial and femoral tunnels. What code(s) would be reported for the open removal of retained deep hardware, along with placement of bone graft to the femur and tibial tunnels? Is it appropriate to assign codes for both the arthroscopic and open portions of the procedure?
Answer : Assign CPT code 29888, Arthroscopically aided anterior cruciate ligament repair/augmentation or reconstruction, for the arthroscopic left anterior cruciate ligament repair. Also assign CPT code(s) 20680, Removal of implant; deep (eg, buried wire, pin, screw, metal band, nail rod or plate), for removal of the retained hardware and 27599, Unlisted procedure, femur or knee, for the bone grafting of the distal femur and tibial tunnels and append modifier LT, Left side, to identify the knee laterality. The removal of the hardware and the tunnels were performed as open procedures. Since the procedures occurred at different sites.
Antibiotic Cement Spacer
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Fourth Quarter 2020: Page 8
Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after December 10, 2020, unless otherwise noted.
Question 4 : A patient with failure of a previous rotator cuff repair presented with right infected proximal humerus osteomyelitis, retained foreign body, draining sinus and biceps tendinitis. Following irrigation and debridement of skin, muscle and bone associated with the draining sinus and osteomyelitis, a decision was made to remove the humeral head and replace it with an articulating antibiotic spacer. The spacer was cemented in place with a mix of gentamicin impregnated cement, vancomycin and tobramycin. In addition, when removing the humeral head, previously placed anchors were removed. Once everything was in place, a biceps tenodesis was performed. How is the use of the antibiotic cement captured? Is it appropriate to assign CPT code 11981?
Answer : Assign CPT code 23470, Arthroplasty, glenohumeral joint; hemiarthroplasty, for the removal of the humeral head and placement of the antibiotic spacer. The biceps tenodesis is inherent and not separately reported, however, CPT code 20680, Removal of implant; deep (eg, buried wire, pin, screw, metal band, nail, rod or plate), may be reported for the removal of the previously placed anchors. It is not appropriate to assign CPT code 11981, Insertion, non-biodegradable drug delivery implant, for the antibiotic cement. A drug delivery implant was not inserted, and mixing antibiotic into the cement is not additionally reported.
Surgery: Respiratory System, Lysis Laryngeal Stenosis with Laser
CPT Assistant, November 2012, Volume 22, Issue 11, page 14
Question: The patient has tracheolaryngeal stenosis. The provider performs microlaryngoscopy with lysis of the stenosis using laser and excision of granulation followed by a steroid injection. How is this reported?
Answer: There is no specific CPT code for lysis of laryngeal stenosis (with or without laser). Therefore, the removal of the stenosis would be reported using an unlisted code 31599, Unlisted procedure, larynx. Whether the steroid injection is into the site of granulation, the area of stenosis, or both, code 31571, Laryngoscopy, direct, with injection into vocal cord(s), therapeutic; with operating microscope or telescope, would be reported, as this is distinctly separate work. It is suggested that the coder review the procedure report or consult the physician.
Surgery: Respiratory System
CPT Assistant, March 2017, Volume 27, Issue 3, page 10
Question: What is the appropriate code to report for shaving/reduction of a patient's thyroid notch or Adam's apple (chondrolaryngoplasty)?
Answer: Currently, there is no specific CPT code to report for shaving/reduction/partial removal of a patient's thyroid notch or Adam's apple (chondrolaryngoplasty). Although the procedure is commonly referred to as a "tracheal shave" it is performed on the thyroid cartilage notch, a laryngeal structure. The procedure is not performed on the trachea. The laryngoplasty family of codes (31580-31592, including 31551-31554) was revised in 2017 and none of these describes this service. Code 31599, Unlisted procedure, larynx would be the appropriate code to report. When reporting an unlisted code to describe a procedure or service, it will be necessary to submit supporting documentation (eg, procedure report) along with the claim to provide an adequate description of the nature, extent, and need for the procedure; and the time, effort, and equipment necessary to provide the service.
Surgery: Respiratory System
CPT Assistant, July 2022, Volume 32, Issue 7, page 18
Question: What is the appropriate code to report a procedure in which the surgeon uses direct laryngoscopy and an operating microscope and/or telescope to incise the subglottic stenosis with a knife?
Answer: There is no specific code to report incising or scoring the subglottic stenosis at one or more sites. Therefore, unlisted code 31599, Unlisted procedure, larynx, should be reported for this procedure. When reporting an unlisted code to describe a procedure or service, it is necessary to submit supporting documentation (eg, procedure report) along with the claim to provide an adequate description of the nature, extent, and need for the procedure, and the time, effort, and equipment necessary to provide the service
CPT: Repair of Rotator Cuff
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Fourth Quarter 2004 Page: 10
Question 7: This patient with a torn rotator cuff and labrum tear was seen at our facility for an arthroscopy of the right shoulder with debridement of the rotator cuff tear and labrum tear. He also underwent a subacromial decompression followed by an open rotator cuff repair. What are the appropriate code assignment(s) for the procedures performed?
Answer: Report code 23410, Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open; acute, for the open rotator cuff repair. Code 29826, Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; decompression of subacromial space with partial acromioplasty, with or without coracoacromial release, for the arthroscopy with subacromial decompression procedure performed. Modifier 59 should be appended to the second code to bypass any edits. The debridement would be integral to the open procedure performed and is not coded.
CPT: Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
Coding Clinic for HCPCS Third Quarter 2012 Page: 5
Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after November 15, 2012 unless otherwise noted.
QUESTION 3 A patient with left shoulder impingement symptoms dating back to a motorcycle accident was seen today to undergo a diagnostic left shoulder arthroscopy with arthroscopic subacromial decompression and debridement. According to the coding rationale for CPT code 29826, Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; decompression of subacromial space with partial acromioplasty, with coracoacromial ligament (ie arch) release, when performed, this code cannot be reported alone. CPT coding guidelines specifically state that the surgical endoscopy/arthroscopy always includes a diagnostic endoscopy/arthroscopy. How would the arthroscopic subacromial decompression with a diagnostic arthroscopy be appropriately reported? ANSWER 3 It would be appropriate to report CPT code 29822, Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; debridement, limited, and code 29826, Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; decompression of subacromial space with partial acromioplasty, with coracoacromial ligament (ie, arch) release, when performed, for the arthroscopic subacromial decompression performed. A subcromial decompression usually involves debridement of soft tissue and bone removal. If the debridement is not clearly documented the coder should query the physician for clarification.
CPT: Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
Coding Clinic for HCPCS Fourth Quarter 2012 Page: 7
Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after February 15, 2013 unless otherwise noted.
Question 3: A patient has a long history of neck and shoulder pain and now presents to have arthroscopic shoulder surgery which includes decompression with acromioplasty, claviculectomy, extensive debridement, and synovectomy. A standard posterior portal was made and the scope was introduced into the glenohumeral joint where extensive synovitis was noticed. An anterior portal was made and complete synovectomy was performed in the rotator area and the posterior and inferior capsular margins. Extensive intra-articular debridement was performed for the degenerative labral tear. A complete bursectomy for extensive synovitis and bursitis in the subacromial space, accessed from the same standard posterior portal was performed, in addition to a subacromial decompression with acromioplasty. A coracoacromial ligament release and distal claviculectomy were performed along with additional debridement in the superior joint capsule. After complete irrigation all portals were closed and patient was in stable condition. We want to report CPT codes 29826, 29824, 29823, and 29821 for the procedures performed. However, codes 29823 (extensive debridement) and 29821 (complete synovectomy) trigger an edit. Can you please clarify whether codes 29823 and 29821 can or cannot be reported since they are considered inherent into code 29824 (claviculectomy)? Or would both procedures be considered performed at a "separate site" within the shoulder and reported with modifier 59 appended? Answer Assign CPT codes 29826, Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; decompression of subacromial space with partial acromioplasty, with or without coracoacromial release, and 29824, Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; distal claviculectomy including distal articular surface (Mumford procedure), for the procedures performed. Different sites or separate compartments within the shoulder are not recognized in the NCCI edits. Therefore, CPT code 29823 is considered bundled with 29824 and would not be separately reported. Additionally, CPT code 29821, Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; synovectomy, complete, would not be reported nor would modifier 59, Distinct Procedural Service, be appended, because the synovectomy is considered bundled into the other procedures performed. The synovectomy was performed through the same portal and is considered a contiguous structure within the shoulder; therefore, not a separate and distinct site.
CPT: Surgery: Musculoskeletal System, Arthroscopic Decompression
CPT Assistant, September 2012, Volume 22, Issue 9, page 17
Question: My physician performs an arthroscopic procedure for decompression, then performs an open procedure for rotator cuff repair (23412, Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff [eg, rotator cuff] open; chronic) and claviculectomy (23120, Claviculectomy; partial). However, code 29826, Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; decompression of subacromial space with partial acromioplasty, with coracoacromial ligament (ie, arch) release, when performed (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure), is an add-on code. How do we report the procedure?
Answer: In addition to codes 23412 and 23120, the arthroscopic decompression procedure should be reported as well. In this specific instance, it is appropriate to additionally report either code 29822, Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; debridement, limited, or code 29823, Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; debridement, extensive. Code 29822 or 29823 may be reported as appropriate, when a subacromial decompression is done by itself. For example, if a subacromial decompression is performed alone, which usually involves debridement of soft tissue and bone removal, code 29822 may be reported. If there is extensive work performed in the removal of the soft tissue and bone, report code 29823. Modifier 59 should be appended to either code 29822 or 29823 to indicate a separately distinct procedure has been performed.
CPT: CPT Assistant, August 2001, Volume 08, Issue 11, page 11
Musculoskeletal System, 23130, 23410 (Q&A)
Question When reporting an acute rotator cuff repair, should the partial acromionectomy be reported separately with code 23130, Acromioplasty or acromionectomy, partial, with or without coracoacromial ligament release?
AMA Comment From a coding perspective, code 23410, Repair of musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff); acute, includes the work involved in performing a partial acromionectomy. Therefore, it would not be appropriate to report 23130 separately.
CPT: Surgery: Musculoskeletal System
CPT Assistant, February 2015, Volume 25, Issue 2, page 10
Question: Does code 23412, Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open; chronic, include a partial acromioplasty or acromionectomy with or without coracoacromial ligament release? Answer: No. Code 23412 does not include a partial acromioplasty or acromionectomy with or without coracoacromial ligament release. To report such a procedure, use code 23130.
Surgery: Female Genital System
CPT Assistant November 2007, Volume 17, Issue 11, pages 8-9
Question: The surgeon used an open approach to remove a sling for stress incontinence and used the cystoscope in the procedure. What are the appropriate codes to report?
Answer: It would be appropriate to report code 57287, Removal or revision of sling for stress incontinence (eg, fascia or synthetic), in addition to code 52000, Cystourethroscopy (separate procedure), because code 57287 does not include the work of performing a cystoscopy
CPT Assistant, June 2003, Volume 06, Issue 13, pages 6-9
Description of Procedure: CPT Code 55866
The patient is taken to the operating room and placed in the modified lithotomy position. The lower abdomen is prepped and draped in the standard fashion. A pneumoperitoneum is achieved in the standard fashion and four trocars are placed. The laparoscope is introduced and attention is turned to first dissecting the seminal vesicles and vas deferens. The peritoneum at the reflection point of the anterior rectum and posterior bladder is incised. The vas deferens is identified on each side and then divided. The seminal vesicles are carefully dissected out using the harmonic scalpel to divide all bleeding vessels until the structures are freed completely. The space just posterior to the seminal vesicles is dissected in order to open Denonvilliers fascia, thereby revealing a pre-rectal fat plane. Attention is then turned to complete mobilization of the opening of the peritoneum and mobilization of the bladder. The median umbilical ligaments and urachus are divided close to the umbilicus. Careful blunt dissection is used to reflect the bladder away from the abdominal wall. This exposes the endo-pelvic fascia. The fat overlying the endo-pelvic fascia then is cleared off and the endo-fascia is incised bilaterally to free the prostate away from the lateral pelvic side wall. The dorsal vein complex is developed, and suture ligated with a 2-0 suture. The bladder neck is then opened. The catheter is removed, and a curved urethral sound is placed to aid in traction of the prostate. This allows identification of the posterior bladder neck, which then is carefully dissected away from the base of the prostate. The area of the pedicles of the prostate then is taken down. The tissue is opened overlying the seminal vesicles; these structures are then withdrawn into the area of dissection and used as traction. Both lateral pedicles then are taken down, up to the level near the apex. The dorsal vein complex is then divided. Careful sharp dissection is used around the apex of the prostate. The prostate is rocked back and forth, and dissection continues along the lateral pedicle plane to define the apex of the prostate posteriorly. The urethra then is identified, and sharp dissection is used to divide the anterior and posterior urethra and the rectourethralis muscle. Then the final attachments are undone, and the specimen is withdrawn in the endo-cath sac. Hemostasis is assured. The vesicourethral anastomosis is performed with interrupted 2-0 suture. A 20 catheter is placed through the anastomosis. A 19 drain is placed through one of the abdominal side ports. All of the four trocar sites are inspected, and all surgical sites inspected at 5mm Hg pressure before removing the trocars under direct vision.
CPT: Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy
CPT Assistant, December 2022, Volume 32, Issue 11, page 8
Clinical Example (55867): A 65-year-old male who is symptomatic due to obstruction from prostatic enlargement chooses to undergo laparoscopic simple suprapubic prostatectomy.
Description of Procedure (55867)
Make a suprapubic incision and introduce a needle. Confirm an intraperitoneal position and create a pneumoperitoneum. Place a midline trocar and insert a zero-degree lens camera. Inspect the abdomen and pelvis for visceral injury or abnormal anatomy. Make five additional incisions after appropriate measurements, and place five additional trocars under direct vision. Adjust the table to place the patient in a steep Trendelenburg position and advance the robot. The four robotic arms are individually docked and pressure points are checked. Make appropriate adjustments to the robotic arms at the surgical console. Next, introduce the laparoscope and mobilize the colon so it is away from the bladder. Make an incision in the posterior bladder wall. Place several stay sutures in the bladder wall to expose the base of the bladder. Identify the ureteral orifices and survey the prostate anatomy to assess for median lobe location and relational anatomy to the bladder. Make an incision at the junction of the prostate and the bladder neck. Carry the incision circumferentially along the capsule of the prostate out laterally and distally. Rock the prostate back and forth and continue dissection along the lateral pedicle plane to define the apex of the prostate posteriorly. Unfasten the final attachments and place the specimen into the endosac and place out of the surgical field. Decrease the pneumoperitoneum and inspect the entire surgical field for evidence of bleeding. Once hemostasis is obtained, advance the bladder neck to the urethral mucosa using fine monofilament suture. Hemostasis is also achieved using cautery and suture. Close the posterior bladder wall with suture. Pass a catheter into the bladder and test the closure by placing 200 ml of saline into the bladder to distend it. Place a drain through one of the abdominal side ports. Inspect all six trocar sites and all surgical sites at 5 mm Hg pressure before the trocars are removed under direct vision. Extract the specimen by enlarging the midline incision and transferring the endosac bag to this area, where it is removed. Close the rectus fascia using suture, inject local anesthetic into all five of the trocar incisions, and close the trocar incisions with interrupted 2-0 nylon sutures. Place sterile dressings over each incision and secure the catheter to the patient's thigh with a catheter strap.
Surgery: Male Genital System CPT Assistant, March 2012, Volume 22, Issue 3, page 10
Question: Would you please provide coding clarification for the following scenario: The urologist performs a robotic prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer, and during the same session also performs a laparoscopic robotic Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz (MMK) urethropexy procedure to prevent stress incontinence. How are these services reported?
Answer: The robotic prostatectomy is reported with code 55866, Laparoscopy, surgical prostatectomy, retropubic radical, including nerve sparing, includes robotic assistance, when performed, and the laparoscopic robotic MMK urethropexy is reported separately with code 51990, Laparoscopy, surgical; urethral suspension for stress incontinence, or code 51992, Laparoscopy, surgical; sling operation for stress incontinence (eg, fascia or synthetic)
Surgery/Integumentary System
CPT Assistant June 2008, Volume 18, Issue 6, pages 14 - 15
Question: If two lesions are removed but only one excision is made, how is this reported?
Answer: From a CPT coding perspective, it is appropriate to report only one excision of lesion code. For example, if two benign skin lesions, measuring 0.5 cm each, are removed with one excision, then only one excision of lesion code would be reported. Because only one excision was performed, it would not be appropriate to report two separate excision of lesion codes. The excision of lesion code should accurately reflect the maximum excised diameter of the two lesions that were excised. For example, two 0.5-cm facial lesions located 1 cm apart that are excised through a single excision would have a maximum excised diameter is 0.5 cm + 1.0 cm + 0.5 cm = 2 cm. Code 11442 would be reported.
Then and Now: Reporting of Cutaneous Excision Pending Pathology
CPT Assistant, May 2012, Volume 22, Issue 5, page 13
Now ,In general, the selection of the appropriate excision code is determined by three parameters: location, maximum excised diameter (which includes the margin), and lesion type (ie, benign or malignant). When the lesion is clearly benign (eg, cyst, lipoma, prior biopsy of benign neoplasm), the excision can be coded as benign at the time of surgery (11400-11471). When there is a prior biopsy showing malignancy, the excision can be coded as malignant at the time of surgery (11600-11646).
Coding excision of a cutaneous lesion pending pathology (eg, lesion of unspecified behavior) as malignant before pathology is available could result in incorrect coding if the lesion is found to be benign on histopathologic examination. Therefore, if the lesion is not clearly benign or malignant, coding and billing should be delayed until the pathology has been confirmed.
CPT: Surgery: Integumentary System, Extensive Undermining
CPT Assistant, November 2022, Volume 32, Issue 11, page 21
Question: Following excision of a basal cell carcinoma on the arm, a 2.7-cm-wide surgical defect is closed with an intradermal purse-string suture. The defect is broadly undermined beyond the edges to mobilize tissue. How is this reported?
Answer: Because extensive undermining beyond the defect edges is performed to mobilize the wound edges, both excision and a complex repair code would be appropriate to report. For this scenario, the malignant excision on the arm would be reported with code 11603, Excision, malignant lesion including margins, trunk, arms, or legs; excised diameter 2.1 to 3.0 cm, and the complex repair would be reported with code 13121, Repair, complex, scalp, arms, and/or legs; 2.6 cm to 7.5 cm.
CPT: Coding Clarification: Endoscopic Injection
CPT Assistant, June 2010, Volume 20, Issue 6, page 4
Control of Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
Reports may describe injection in conjunction with attempts to control spontaneous bleeding resulting from causes, such as diverticulosis, angiodysplasia, or prior session interventions. When injection therapy is used to control hemorrhage not associated with esophageal or gastric varices, the codes below are used, depending on the extent of the base endoscopic procedure. The codes to report the control of bleeding are used only once, even if the injection therapy is combined with other modalities to control hemorrhage.
For example, if the injection of epinephrine is combined with placement of a clip or use of a cautery probe, the control of bleeding code should only be used once. The control of bleeding related to an intervention in the same session (eg, polypectomy) is included in the intervention service.
Exception to Endoscopy Injection and Control of Bleeding Codes
Bleeding that starts as a result of a therapeutic intervention (eg, snare removal or biopsy) and is controlled by any method, is considered part of the initial therapeutic procedure and, should not be separately reported with codes for injection and/or control of bleeding.
Exception to code 45335: For injection to control bleeding, report code 45334.
Exception to code 45381: For injection to control bleeding, report code 45382.
CPT:Surgery: Digestive System
CPT Assistant, January 2017, Volume 27, Issue 1, page 6
Question: What is the appropriate CPT code to report a colonoscopy during which two flat polyps in the transverse colon were removed via a saline injection-lift technique using a hot snare? Is a colonoscopy with a polypectomy removed by injection of epinephrine for a lift polypectomy reported differently?
Answer: Submucosal injection of substances, whether saline or epinephrine, to lift the polyp and facilitate a polypectomy, is reported with code 45381, Colonoscopy, flexible; with directed submucosal injection(s), any substance. The polypectomy would be reported with code 45385, Colonoscopy, flexible; with removal of tumor(s), polyp(s), or other lesion(s) by snare technique, with modifier 59 appended.
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR [eg, code 45390 with colonoscopy]) includes cap-assisted or ligation-assisted (banding) removal of a lesion, along with injection-assisted snare removal techniques. Whether performed in the upper or lower gastrointestinal tract, EMR requires the lift technique to create a space beneath the lesion to isolate the lesion from underlying submucosa, and the use of a specialized device to isolate the tissue to be removed. Coding for EMR procedures requires the performance of
(1) a submucosal injection to lift the lesion;
(2) demarcation of the lesion, often by creating a pseudopolyp out of tissue; and
(3) endoscopic snare resection.
If all three components are not performed, it is not appropriate to report an EMR procedure; rather, the service(s) performed (submucosal injection [45381 only], snare polypectomy [45385 only] are separately reported.
ICD Guideline
2) Chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant status
Patients who have undergone kidney transplant may still have some form of chronic kidney disease (CKD) because the kidney transplant may not fully restore kidney function. Therefore, the presence of CKD alone does not constitute a transplant complication. Assign the appropriate N18 code for the patient's stage of CKD and code Z94.0, Kidney transplant status. If a transplant complication such as failure or rejection or other transplant complication is documented, see section I.C.19.g for information on coding complications of a kidney transplant. If the documentation is unclear as to whether the patient has a complication of the transplant, query the provider.
Integumentary vs Musculoskeletal Lesion Excisions
CPT Assistant, April 2010, Volume 20, Issue 4, page 3
There is often confusion in determining whether the excision of soft tissue tumors is reported with codes from the integumentary system or the musculoskeletal system. To dispel this ambiguity, new codes and guidelines have been established for the integumentary and musculoskeletal system in the CPT 2010 codebook. This article will provide an overview on the different types of lesion excisions in the integumentary and musculoskeletal systems, as well as describe the additions and revisions to these codes and guidelines.
Review of Skin Anatomy
Skin, the body's largest organ system, includes the epidermis (thinner outer layer) and the dermis (thicker inner layer). Below the dermis is the subcutaneous tissue, then the fascia, which is the layer between the subcutaneous tissue and the underlying muscle.
Lesions deep to the skin may occur in the soft tissue, deep subcutaneous plane, subfascial (below the fascia), intramuscular (into the muscle), or submuscular (below the muscle).
Integumentary System Guidelines
Guidelines for the excision of integumentary lesions have been clarified in CPT 2010.
Simple closures are included in the excision of benign and malignant skin lesions. If an intermediate closure (codes 12031-12057) or complex closure (codes 13100-13153) is required, it should be separately reported. When reconstructive closures are required, they are separately reported with codes 15002-15261 and 15570-15770.
The following are the three repair (closure) definitions:
-
Simple repair: used when the wound is superficial; eg, involving primarily epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissue and no deeper structures. The wound closure involves closing one layer, and includes local anesthesia, and chemical or electrocauterization of unclosed wounds.
-
Intermediate repair: includes requires layered closure of one or more of the deeper layers of subcutaneous tissue and superficial (nonmuscle) fascia. Single-layer closure of heavily contaminated wounds, which required extensive cleaning or removal of particulate matter also constitutes as intermediate repair.
-
Complex repair: requires more than layered closure, such as scar revision, debridement (eg, traumatic lacerations or avulsions), extensive undermining, stents or retention sutures. Necessary preparation includes creation of a defect for repairs (eg, excision of a scar requiring a complex repair) or the debridement of complicated lacerations or avulsions.
Integumentary Lesion Excisions
The Integumentary System guidelines listed in the CPT 2010 codebook define an excision as the removal of a lesion, including margins, through the full thickness of the dermis, and including simple (nonlayered) closure and local anesthesia.
Code selection is determined by measuring the greatest clinical diameter of the apparent lesion, plus the margin required for complete excision, prior to the procedure. Integumentary excision procedures may require simple, intermediate, or complex closures.
Simple repair is included in the lesion excision and is not reported separately. However, repair by intermediate or complex closures should be reported separately.
For example, if a malignant skin lesion on the left arm measuring 1.0 cm is excised with 0.3-cm margins (excised diameter 1.6 cm), and requires a complex closure of the wound of 3.0-cm length after accounting for manipulation of the wound for closure, report CPT code 11602, Excision, malignant lesion including margins, trunk, arms, or legs; excised diameter 1.1 to 2.0 cm, for the excision; for the repair, report code 13121, Repair, complex, scalp, arms, and/or legs; 2.6 cm to 7.5 cm.
Note that when the excision of benign or malignant skin lesions (codes 11400-11446 and 11600-11646) is performed in conjunction with an adjacent tissue transfer (codes 14000-14302), only the adjacent tissue transfer should be reported, as the excision is included in this procedure.
New Musculoskeletal System Guidelines
Whether reporting the excision or radical resection of soft tissue tumors from the subcutaneous, fascial or subfascial layer, appreciable vessel exploration and/or neuroplasty should be reported separately. Simple and intermediate repair closures are included in the excision procedures, but if complex repairs with extensive undermining or other techniques are performed to close a defect created by a lesion excision, the complex repair codes are reported -separately. The excision of musculoskeletal lesions (tumors), includes the dissection or elevation of tissue planes in order to allow resection of the tumor, and therefore, those services are not reported separately.
The code selection for musculoskeletal lesion excisions is determined by measuring the greatest diameter of the tumor, in addition to the narrowest margin required for the complete excision of the tumor, based on the physician's judgment, at the time of the excision.
The radical resection of soft tissue tumors may be confined to a specific layer, for instance the subcutaneous or subfascial tissue, or it may involve the removal of tissue from one or more layers. Radical resection of soft tissue tumors is most commonly used for malignant or very aggressive benign tumors.
Musculoskeletal Lesion Excisions
Musculoskeletal lesion excision codes pertain to subcutaneous, superficial, or deep soft tissues under the skin, which may include subcutaneous fat, fascia, muscle and bone. Soft tissue excision codes are dispersed throughout the CPT 2010 musculoskeletal section and are categorized by anatomic site.
When coding musculoskeletal procedures, it is important to note that the excision must meet the criteria listed in the code descriptor. For example, in order to report code 26116, Excision, tumor, soft tissue, or vascular malformation, of hand or finger; subfascial (eg, intramuscular); less than 1.5 cm, the tumor must be down to the muscle (ie, located between the fascia and muscle) or be intramuscular, such as a muscle sarcoma.
Coding Tip :For radical resection of tumors of cutaneous origin (eg, melanoma), report the appropriate code from the 11600-11646 series. Appropriate code choice is based on the measurement of the tumor plus its margin made at the time of excision.
The physician must determine the depth of the excision in order to ascertain whether the integumentary system or musculoskeletal system CPT codes are appropriate. Documentation must reflect what is being performed, in order to substantiate the selection of these codes.
Coding Tip : For radical tumor resection, neuroplasty and reconstructive procedures (eg, adjacent tissue transfer, flap) should be reported in addition to the excision code.
The following are the different types of excisions, as listed in the guidelines:
Subcutaneous soft tissue tumors: involve the simple or marginal resection of tumors confined to subcutaneous fatty tissue below the skin, but above the deep fascia.
Fascial or subfascial soft tissue tumors: involve the resection of tumors confined to the tissue within or below the deep fascia, but not involving the muscle or bone. Included are digital (ie, fingers and toes) sub-fascial tumors that involve the tendons, tendon sheaths, or joints of the digit.
Radical resection of soft tissue tumors: involve the resection of a tumor, usually malignant, with wide -margins of normal tissue.
Radical resection of bone tumors: involve the resection of the tumor with wide margins of normal tissue. Radical resection of bone tumors is usually performed for malignant tumors or very aggressive tumors. (See CPT Assistant February 2010.)
Frequently Asked Questions
Question: A deep subcutaneous mass (ie, not subfascial) requiring a resection of less than 3-cm diameter in the posterior aspect of the left ankle is excised. Would the integumentary lesion excision code series 11400-11471 or 11600-11646 be reported?
Answer: No. The 11400-11471 and 11600-11646 series of codes (benign and malignant integumentary lesion excisions) describe excisions of cutaneous lesions, as well as superficial subcutaneous lesions such as cysts and scars.
When the lesions are located in deep subfascial or submuscular tissues, the appropriate code from the Musculoskeletal System should be reported to describe the procedure. Therefore, code 27618, Excision, tumor, soft tissue of leg or ankle area, subcutaneous; less than 3 cm, should be reported for the excision of this deep subcutaneous mass in the posterior aspect of the left ankle.
Question: May I report code 19260, Excision of chest wall tumor including ribs with Modifier 52 appended, if the excision of a 10-cm chest wall mass did not include removing the ribs?
Answer: No. It would not be appropriate to report code 19260, Excision of chest wall tumor including ribs, with Modifier 52 appended, as the procedure did not involve removal of the ribs. If the procedure involves removing a chest wall tumor without the ribs, it would be more appropriate to report a musculoskeletal tumor excision code, such as code 21557, Radical resection of tumor (eg, malignant neoplasm), soft tissue of neck or anterior thorax; less than 5 cm, depending on the depth, size, and malignant or benign nature of the lesion.
Question: What would be the appropriate CPT code for excision of a sebaceous cyst on the scalp or on the face that is subdermal or deeper?
Answer: Integumentary lesion excision codes pertain to the epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissue, while musculoskeletal lesion excision codes pertain to subcutaneous, superficial or deep soft tissues. Code ranges 11400-11446 and 11600-11646 represent lesions that normally occur on the surface of the skin (epidermis) or near the surface of the skin (dermis), compared to the type of lesion (or tumor) that occurs in the subfascial or fascial tissue, muscles and joints, as listed in the musculoskeletal section.
A sebaceous cyst is a skin lesion and may be very large, distending the skin and pushing into the subcutaneous fatty tissue, but it is a skin lesion, and therefore, should be coded using the integumentary lesion excision codes, depending on the size of the cyst.
Code range 21011-21016 lists the excision codes for soft tissue tumors—subcutaneous and subfascial—on the face or scalp. When coding musculoskeletal procedures, it is important to note that the excision must meet the criteria listed in the code descriptor. The physician must determine and document the depth of the excision to determine whether the integumentary system or musculoskeletal system CPT codes are appropriate.
Terms Defined
-
Subcutaneous soft tissue tumors: usually benign and resected without removing a significant amount of surrounding normal tissue.
-
Fascial or subfascial soft tissue tumors: usually benign, involve fascia and/or muscle, and resected without removing a significant amount of surrounding normal tissue.
-
Digital (ie, fingers and toes) subcutaneous tumors: adjacent to—but not breaching—the tendon, tendon sheath, or joint capsule.
-
Digital (ie, fingers and toes) fascial or subfascial tumors: involve the tendon, tendon sheath, or joint capsule.
-
Radical resection of soft tissue tumors: most commonly used for malignant tumors, and extremely aggressive -benign tumors in which wide margins of normal tissue are excised.
Excision or Resection of Soft Tissue Tumors
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Third Quarter 2018: Page 1
Musculoskeletal System.
Soft tissue tumors refer to a tumor located within the soft tissue. These tumors can occur almost anywhere including the soft tissue between the muscles, ligaments, nerves, and blood vessels. These tumors can be either malignant or benign. The code assignments for soft tissue excisions or resections are anatomic site specific and can be located under main term Tumor in the index of the CPT codebook. The depths of soft tissues are identified as follows:
Subcutaneous soft connective tissue tumors — Tumors confined to subcutaneous tissue below the skin but above the deep fascia. Code selection is based on the location and size of the tumor.
Fascial or subfascial soft tissue tumors — Tumors confined to the tissue within or below the deep fascia, but not involving the bone. Code selection is based on the location and size of the tumor.
Please note, detailed guidance providing descriptions defining the depth of soft tissue tumors can be found in the Musculoskeletal System section of the CPT codebook.
Simple and intermediate repairs following the excision or resection would be included in the code assignment for the excision or resection of the soft tissue tumor and not separately reported. Complex repairs, skin grafts, and flap grafts would be separately reported if a reconstruction is required. Additionally, if surrounding soft tissue is removed during a radical resection of a bone tumor, the radical resection of soft tissue tumor codes would not be separately reported.Let's look at a few questions received in our office and the responses provided:
QUESTION 1: Patient was prepped and dissection was carried through the hypodermis and the lipoma capsule was identified and dissected. The lipoma of the left upper back extended through the fascia and included a subfascial component. However, it did not involve the musculature. The skin was closed in layers; deep and superficial dermis.What is the appropriate CPT code for the excision of the lipoma?
ANSWER: Based on the documentation submitted a 5cm incision was made along the skin tension lines along the left upper back. Using a fine clamp, the lipoma capsule was identified. The lipoma extended through the fascia and included a subfascial component but did not involve the musculature. Because the excision did include a subfascial component, it would be appropriate to report either CPT code 21932, Excision, tumor, soft tissue of back or flank, subfascial (e.g., intramuscular); less than 5 cm, or CPT code 21933, ;Excision, tumor, soft tissue of back or flank, subfascial (e.g., intramuscular); 5 cm or greater, dependant on the size of the lesion excised. The size of the tumor was not documented therefore a definitive code cannot be provided.
QUESTION 2 : Patient presents for excision of an umbilical mass. Manual pressure was applied and a 13-14 mm verrucous mass was delivered from within the umbilicus. The mass was transected and additional tissue was debrided. The fascial defect and umbilical skin were all closed and repaired in order to create a natural appearing umbilicus. What is the correct CPT code for the procedure performed?
ANSWER: Based on the documentation submitted, report CPT code 22902, Excision, tumor, soft tissue of abdominal wall, subcutaneous; less than 3 cm, for the excision of the umbilical mass. According to the operative report submitted the base of the umbilicus was grasped where the granulation type tissue ended and the mass was transected sharply. The remaining umbilical skin was closed and tacked to the repaired fascia to create a natural appearing neo-umbilicus.
QUESTION 3 :Patient with a ganglion cyst and an osteophyte on the interphalangeal (IP) joint of the right index finger presents for removal. A digital block administered and incision made over the distal phalanx creating skin flaps. The ganglion cyst was removed first.
Then another incision was made and carried to the joint surface and the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint was entered while protecting the extensor tendon, the osteophytes were debrided and removed with a curette and rongeurs. The skin was closed. What are the correct codes for removal of the ganglion cyst and the osteophytes of the right index finger?
ANSWER: It would be appropriate to assign CPT codes 26210, Excision or curettage of bone cyst or benign tumor of proximal, middle, or distal phalanx of finger, for the excision of the osteophyte from the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) and 26160, Excision of lesion tendon sheath or joint capsule (e.g., cyst, mucous cyst, or ganglion), hand or finger, for the excision of the cyst from the radial border of the index finger.
Reporting both CPT codes produces an NCCI edit. Although the removal of the cyst and osteophytes were removed from the same joint, a separate incision was made to accomplish the procedure. Therefore, append modifier 59, Distinct Procedural Service, to identify that a separate incision was made in order to remove the cyst and/or the osteophytes and append modifier F6, Right hand, second digit, to identify the finger treated.
CPT: Surgery: Female Genital System
CPT Assistant, December 2011, Volume 21, Issue 12, page 16
Question: Is code 58660 to be used only for adhesiolysis of the ovaries and fallopian tubes or more broadly for pelvic adhesiolysis? For example, during a laparoscopic procedure, a surgeon performs extensive lysis of omental adhesions from the abdominal wall. Should code 58660 or code 49329 be reported?
Answer: There is no specific CPT code for laparoscopic lysis of omental/abdominal adhesions. Because adhesions may complicate the successful performance of the laparoscopic procedure, lysis of adhesions is often the first step of the exploration and may not be coded separately. If the adhesions are extensive and take significant additional work, code 49329, Unlisted laparoscopy procedure, abdomen, peritoneum and omentum, may be reported in addition to the primary procedure. Documentation must reflect the additional work required for the removal (lysis) of dense adhesions.
To differentiate—while code 58660, Laparoscopy, surgical; with lysis of adhesions (salpingolysis, ovariolysis) (separate procedure), involves endoscopic inspection and evaluation of the abdomen and pelvis, it represents uterine adnexal (ie, fallopian tubes, ovaries functionally and structurally adjacent to the uterus), adhesiolysis of any degree performed by any method. Code 58660 may be reported in addition to the primary procedure, only if dense/extensive adhesions are encountered that require effort beyond that which is ordinarily provided for the laparoscopic procedure. As code 58660 is designated as a separate procedure, modifier 59, Distinct Procedural Service, should be appended to indicate that code 58660 is not considered an integral component of the other procedure(s).
CPT: Lysis of Adhesions
Coding Clinic for HCPCS Third Quarter 2010 Page: 5
Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after October 15, 2010 unless otherwise noted.
QUESTION #14 A patient with chronic pelvic pain and severe dyspareunia presents for laparoscopy. The patient was brought to the operating room and given general anesthesia. The laparoscopy was started and numerous adhesions were found between the omentum and uterus, as well as the omentum and anterior abdominal wall. These extensive adhesions were taken down with sharp and blunt dissection and a Ligasure device was also utilized to remove these adhesions. This portion of the procedure required significant operating time before the remainder of the operation was completed, which included right salpingo-oophorectomy, fulguration of pelvic endometriosis, and chromopertubation. Would it be appropriate in this scenario to separately report the lysis of adhesions?
ANSWER: Lysis of adhesions are typically included as part of the laparoscopic procedure. However, if dense and/or extensive adhesions are found that require effort beyond that require additional work outside of the procedure being performed, it would be appropriate to separately report the lysis of adhesions. Therefore, based on the operative report submitted, it would be appropriate to report CPT code 58660, Laparoscopy, surgical; with lysis of adhesions (salpingolysis, ovariolysis) (separate procedure), in addition to CPT codes 58661, Laparoscopy, surgical; with removal of adnexal structures (partial or total oophorectomy and/or salpingectomy), and 58662, Laparoscopy, surgical; with fulguration or excision of lesions of the ovary, pelvic viscera, or peritoneal surface by any method, for the procedures performed.
Modifier 59, Distinct Procedural Service, should be appended to CPT code 58660 to indicate that the procedure reported is separate and distinct from the main procedure being performed.
Please note, however, to separately report lysis of adhesions documentation must support that dense and/or extensive adhesions were encountered and that they required a significant amount of additional work to remove the adhesions.
Lysis of Adhesions
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Third Quarter 2019: Page 11
Question 7 : The article "To lyse or not to lyse adhesions," published in the AHA's Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Fourth Quarter 2018 newsletter, provided coding advice in two Q&A's stating that lysis of adhesions (58660) should be additionally reported with other laparoscopic surgical codes (58661, 58662). However, lysis of adhesions is identified as a separate procedure and also no modifier is allowed in order to bypass the NCCI edit. Our question is why would the AHA's Coding Clinic for HCPCS advise facilities to report lysis of adhesions when there is no modifier allowed in the Procedure to Procedure (PTP) Coding Edits? What is the rationale?
Answer : The NCCI Edits are geared towards Medicare reporting. Whether or not separately reporting lysis of adhesions is allowed, is up to the discretion of the specific payer(s). As published in AHA's Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Fourth Quarter 2018, for facility reporting under the OPPS, lysis of adhesions is usually considered inherent in the primary procedure and not separately reported. However, there are instances when the lysing of adhesions (i.e., dense and/or extensive) would be considered appropriate to report separately. Coders should not code lysis of adhesions based solely on the mention of adhesions or lysis in an operative report.
The determination as to whether the lysis of adhesions would be significant enough to code and report depends on the surgeon's documentation. The documentation must support that dense and/or extensive adhesions were encountered and that they required a significant amount of additional work to remove the adhesions. Documentation of clinical significance by the surgeon may include, but is not limited to, the following language: numerous adhesions requiring a long time to lyse, extensive adhesions involving tedious lysis, extensive lysis, etc.
Coding Tips from the NCCI Policy Manual: Chapter VII, CPT Code Range 50000–59999
Urinary System Insertion of urinary bladder catheters may not be separately reported when performed at the time of, or just prior to, a surgical procedure. The placement of urinary bladder catheters is considered inherent to the primary procedure. This includes procedures that involve the placement of a urethral/bladder catheter for postoperative drainage.
CPT code 52204, Cystourethroscopy, with biopsy(s), includes all of the biopsies obtained during the procedure. Therefore, it is only reported one time no matter how many biopsies are taken. When a code descriptor in the genitourinary system includes hernia repair, for example CPT code 51500, Excision of urachal cyst or sinus, with or without umbilical hernia repair, it is not appropriate to additionally report the hernia repair unless it is performed at a different site through a separate incision.
CPT code 51700, Bladder irrigation, simple, lavage and/or instillation, may be assigned to report irrigation with therapeutic agents or when performed as an independent therapeutic procedure. It may not be separately reported when part of a more comprehensive service, for example to gain access to, or visualize the urinary system. In addition, CPT code 51700 may not be reported for irrigation of a urinary catheter. When reporting endoscopic procedures, all minor related components are included and not reported separately. The example provided in the NCCI manual pertains to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
A TURP includes meatotomy, urethral calibration and/or dilation, urethroscopy, and cystoscopy. Therefore, it is not appropriate to separately report the included procedures.
Procedures that involve ureteral anastomoses (for example, CPT code range 50740-50825, 50860) are generally mutually exclusive and would not be reported together. One example of an exception to this guidance is if one type of anastomosis is performed on one ureter and a different type of anastomosis is performed on the contralateral ureter. In that case, it would be appropriate to report both procedures utilizing laterality modifiers (e.g., LT, Left Side and RT, Right Side). Insertion of a self-retaining indwelling stent during cystourethroscopy with ureteroscopy and/or pyeloscopy, captured with CPT code 52332, Cystourethroscopy, with insertion of indwelling ureteral stent (eg, Gibbons or double-J type), may not be reported for the insertion and removal of a temporary ureteral stent when performed during a diagnostic or therapeutic cystourethroscopy with ureteroscopy and/or pyeloscopy. When a ureteral stent is inserted at an anastomosis of a ureter and another structure in order to maintain patency, or if a ureteral stent is inserted when the ureter is incised during a procedure, the insertion of the stent is inherent to the primary procedure and may not be additionally reported.
The CPT codes that capture litholapaxy (CPT codes 52317-18) are reported for crushing/fragmentation and removal of calculus in the urinary bladder; but not when the calculus is the result of a procedure to remove, manipulate, and/or fragment calculi higher up in the urinary tract.
Male Genital System
Puncture aspiration of a hydrocele, CPT code 55000, Puncture aspiration of hydrocele, tunica vaginalis, with or without injection of medication, may not be reported with inguinal hernia repairs and with services that involve the tunical vaginalis and proximal anatomy, for example the scrotum and vas deferens. There are several CPT codes (for example, 52601-52649, 53850-53855, 55801-55845, 55866, and 55880), that describe various methods of removing or destroying prostate tissues. As these codes are mutually exclusive, it is not appropriate to report two codes from this range together.
Female Genital System
When assigning codes for pelvic exenteration procedures that include multiple structures, (for example, CPT code 51597, Pelvic exenteration, complete, for vesical, prostatic or urethral malignancy, with removal of bladder and ureteral transplantations, with or without hysterectomy and/or abdominoperineal resection of rectum and colon and colostomy, or any combination thereof), it is not appropriate to separately report the removal of individual structures.
If a vaginal hysterectomy is accompanied by additional dissection to repair a rectocele (with perineorrhaphy if performed) or cystocele (with repair of urethrocele if performed) or a combined anteroposterior colporrhaphy to repair a rectocele and a cystocele, it may be appropriate to report CPT codes 57250, Posterior colporrhaphy, repair of rectocele with or without perineorrhaphy, or 57240, Anterior colporrhaphy, repair of cystocele with or without repair of urethrocele, including cystourethroscopy, when performed, or 57260, Combined anteroposterior colporrhaphy, including cystourethroscopy, when performed;, with the code for a vaginal hysterectomy.
In these examples, the correct NCCI PTP-associated modifier would be appended. It is not appropriate to report colpopexy codes (CPT codes 57282-83) to additionally report normal fixation of the vagina to surrounding tissues when performed with a vaginal hysterectomy. Only if a more extensive colpopexy is performed consistent with the requirements of CPT code 57282-83 is an additional code with the use of the appropriate NCCI PTP-associated modifier allowed.
Surgery: Integumentary System
CPT Assistant, July 2010, Volume 20, Issue 7, page 10
Question: What is the appropriate code to report for excision of epidermal or pilar cysts?
Answer: Excision of epidermal or pilar cysts is properly coded with the integumentary excision codes 11400-11446, together with an intermediate repair code when indicated. Because these tumors originate from the dermis or adnexal structures, they are not soft tissue tumors, even though they may protrude into the subcutaneous tissue.
Surgery: Musculoskeletal System, Chevron And Aiken Osteotomy
CPT Assistant, September 2013, Volume 23, Issue 9, page 17
Question: If a distal metatarsal Chevron osteotomy was performed with an Aiken osteotomy of the first proximal phalanx for hallux valgus and hallux valgus interphalangeus of the left foot, would the case be reported with code 28299, Correction, hallux valgus (bunion), with or without sesamoidectomy; by double osteotomy, code 28296, Correction, hallux valgus (bunion), with or without sesamoidectomy; with metatarsal osteotomy (eg, Mitchell, Chevron, or concentric type procedures), or code 28310, Osteotomy, shortening, angular or rotational correction; proximal phalanx, first toe (separate procedure)?
Answer: When a distal metatarsal Chevron osteotomy is performed along with an Aiken osteotomy of the first proximal phalanx for hallux valgus and hallux valgus interphalangeus of the left foot, a double osteotomy is performed. Therefore, it is appropriate to report double osteotomy code 28299.
Surgery: Musculoskeletal System, Osteotomy Phalanx and Metatarsal
CPT Assistant, October 2013, Volume 23, Issue 10, page 18
Question: What is the appropriate code to report corrective surgery involving the removal of the medial eminence (bunion), removal of dorsal osteophytes from the metatarsal head, and removal of an osteophytic rim from the base of the proximal phalanx? Dorsal closing wedge and medial closing wedge osteotomies of the proximal phalanx with fixation using a single screw were also performed.
Answer: If both osteotomies were performed on the phalanx (a bidirectional osteotomy) it would be appropriate to report code 28298, Correction, hallux valgus (bunion), with or without sesamoidectomy; by phalanx osteotomy. If one of the osteotomies was performed on the phalanx and the other on the metatarsal, it would be appropriate to report code 28299, Correction, hallux valgus (bunion), with or without sesamoidectomy; by double osteotomy. The resection of the osteophytes and the medial eminence would be included in either code.
Surgery: Musculoskeletal System
CPT Assistant, April 2016, Volume 26, Issue 4, page 8
Question: What is the appropriate code(s) to report a bunionectomy, which includes a proximal phalanx osteotomy and an osteotomy of the metatarsal base instead of a metatarsal head?
Answer: Code 28299, Correction, hallux valgus (bunion), with or without sesamoidectomy; by double osteotomy, is reported for a bunionectomy that includes two osteotomies.
Revised Bunionectomy Coding for 2017
CPT Assistant, December 2016, Volume 26, Issue 12, page 3
Code 28299 includes the removal of prominent or hypertrophied bone from the medial aspect of the first metatarsal head (distal metaphysis) along with double osteotomies performed within the first ray, and may additionally include the resection of excess bone at the dorsomedial, dorsal, or dorsolateral aspect of the metatarsal head, and/or base of the proximal phalanx with or without related soft-tissue correction, resection, or release. The procedure represented by code 28299 may also involve tendon and other soft-tissue balancing and/or the removal of one or both sesamoids.
Code 28299 includes three double osteotomy options:
-
distal first metatarsal osteotomy and proximal phalanx osteotomy;
-
distal first metatarsal osteotomy and proximal first metatarsal osteotomy;
-
proximal first metatarsal osteotomy and proximal phalanx osteotomy
Tendon Release and Lengthening with Bunionectomy
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Third Quarter 2007 Page: 6-9
Question 2: A bilateral modified Austin bunionectomy, proximal phalangeal osteotomy, release of contracted adduction hallucis tendon, and extensor hallucis longus tendon lengthening, was performed at our facility. We assigned CPT code 28299-50 for the double osteotomy of the great toe.
We realize that tendon releases are included in the bunionectomy codes, so CPT codes 28208-50, 28232-50, and 28234-50, etc., would not be reported. Would we code the tendon release when done in the same area of the bunionectomy? Would we code the tendon lengthening performed?
Answer: Tendon lengthening is not considered an inclusive component of CPT code 28299; therefore, Modifier 59 would be appended to code 28240. Report CPT code 28299, Correction, hallux valgus (bunion), with or without sesamoidectomy; by double osteotomy, and code 28240, Tenotomy, lengthening, or release, abductor hallucis muscle, for the procedures performed.
Tendon releases are inherent in the bunionectomy procedure and would not be reported. When reporting additional procedures that are separate and distinct from the bunionectomy procedure, Modifier 59, Distinct procedural service, would be appended.
Medial Phalangeal Austin-Akin Osteotomy
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, First Quarter 2012 Page: 6
QUESTION 8: A patient underwent an Austin-Akin osteotomy at our facility and we need assistance in the correct code assignment for this procedure. The Austin-Akin procedure has been defined as a double osteotomy and is usually performed on the proximal phalanx and distal metatarsal or double osteotomy of the metatarsal. We currently report CPT code 28299, Correction, hallux valgus (bunion), with or without sesamoidectomy; by double osteotomy, for this procedure. Recently, an Austin-Akin osteotomy was performed and the physician documented the medial phalanx as opposed to the proximal phalanx. Would this still be coded as an Austin-Akin procedure since it was performed on the medial phalanx instead of the proximal phalanx? Any guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated.
ANSWER: Report CPT code 28299, Correction, hallux valgus (bunion), with or without sesamoidectomy; by double osteotomy, for the Austin-Akin osteotomy performed on the medial phalanx. The Akin osteotomy portion of the procedure is a medial closing wedge osteotomy performed at the level of the proximal phalangeal base.
The Reporting of Add-On Codes Coding Clinic for HCPCS, First Quarter 2019: Page 10 Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after March 26, 2019, unless otherwise noted.Within the CPT coding classification system there is a specific set of CPT codes categorized as add-on codes. These add-on codes are located within the CPT codebook and describe procedures or services commonly performed in addition to the primary procedure. In the CPT codebook these codes are identified by a plus (+) symbol preceding the CPT code. The presence of this symbol indicates that the specific CPT code can only be reported in addition to a primary procedure. Because add-on codes are considered an integral part of another procedure, it is important to note that add-on codes should NEVER be reported as a stand-alone code.
The add-on concept in CPT applies only to add-on procedures or services performed by the same physician on the same date of service as the primary procedure.
The Primary Procedure Code
The primary procedure code is the main CPT code that represents the greater part of the procedure or services provided by accurately describing the procedure/service performed through the narrative listed in the CPT code descriptor.
However, because procedures can be performed in different ways, some CPT codes exist which describe procedures performed in different fashions with different levels of complexity, or association with other related procedures. When appropriate an add-on CPT code would be reported in conjunction with the applicable primary procedure code. The add-on code would describe the procedure or service provided in addition to the other related service or procedure performed. Please note, that the process of assigning any CPT code to a procedure or service is dependent on both the procedure performed and the documentation supporting it.
Reporting Guidance for HCPCS/CPT Add-On Codes Add-on codes are categorized by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as a HCPCS/CPT code that describes a service that, with one exception (see CR7501 for details), is always performed in conjunction with another primary service. CMS has divided the add-on codes into three groups to distinguish the payment policy for each group. The three groups are listed as follows:
1. Type I — A Type I add-on code has a limited number of identifiable primary procedure codes. The CR lists the Type I add-on codes with their acceptable primary procedure codes. A Type I add-on code, with one exception, is eligible for payment if one of the listed primary procedure codes is also eligible for payment to the same practitioner for the same patient on the same date of service.
2. Type II — A Type II add-on code does not have a specific list of primary procedure codes. The CR lists the Type II add-on codes without any primary procedure codes. Claims processing contractors are encouraged to develop their own lists of primary procedure codes for this type of add-on codes. Like the Type I add-on codes, a Type II add-on code is eligible for payment if an acceptable primary procedure code as determined by the claims processing contractor is also eligible for payment to the same practitioner for the same patient on the same date of service.
3. Type III — A Type III add-on code has some, but not all, specific primary procedure codes identified in the CPT codebook. The CR lists the Type III add-on codes with the primary procedure codes that are specifically identifiable.
However, claims processing contractors are advised that these lists are not exclusive and there are other acceptable primary procedure codes for add-on codes in this Type. Claims processing contractors are encouraged to develop their own lists of additional primary procedure codes for this group of add-on codes. Like the Type I add-on codes, a Type III add-on code is eligible for payment if an acceptable primary procedure code as determined by the claims processing contractor is also eligible for payment to the same practitioner for the same patient on the same date of service.
CMS will update the list of add-on codes with their primary procedure codes on an annual basis on or by January 1 every year based on changes to the CPT Manual or HCPCS Level II Manual. Quarterly updates will be posted as necessary on April 1, July 1, and October 1 each year. If no changes occur in the add-on code edits for one quarter, no quarterly update will be posted.Let's take a look at a few questions and answers regarding the appropriate reporting of add-ons:
QUESTION 1 :CPT code 93312, Echocardiography, transesophageal, real-time with image documentation (2D) (with or without M-mode recording); including probe placement, image acquisition, interpretation and report, is a primary code that is appropriate for add on codes 93321, Echocardiography, transesophageal, real-time with image documentation (2D) (with or without M-mode recording); including probe placement, image acquisition, interpretation and report, follow-up or limited study, and 93325, Doppler echocardiography color flow velocity mapping. When reporting multiple add-on codes that are not related, can a single primary code be reported for all of the add-on codes? Or, does a single primary code need to be billed for or with each add-on code that is reported?
ANSWER Add-on codes must be reported in conjunction with an appropriate primary procedure code when performed by the same physician on the same date of service. The primary procedure code must be related and appropriate to be reported in combination with the add-on code.
Please note, when the CPT manual identifies specific primary codes, the add-on code should not be reported for other unrelated HCPCS/CPT codes or HCPCS/CPT codes not listed in the CPT coding instructions. CMS identifies add-on codes and their primary codes based on CPT coding manual instruction, CMS interpretation of HCPCS/CPT codes, and CMS coding instructions. Therefore, based on the documentation submitted, both add-on codes, 93321 and 93325 may be reported with CPT code 93312 (echocardiography) for the services provided. It would be inappropriate to report 93312 twice. There are also no NCCI edits when all three codes are reported at the same session.
QUESTION 2 Can you please clarify if an add-on code can ever be reported for a different date of service (DOS) than the primary code?
ANSWER :No, an add-on code describes a service that is performed in conjunction with an acceptable primary procedure performed on the same patient on the same date of service. Therefore, it would be inappropriate to report an add-on code on a different date of service than the primary procedure.
QUESTION 3 :The physician places venous stents bilaterally in the iliac veins.Would we code this as 37238-50 for initial stents for both iliac veins or should it be coded 37238 for one side and 37239 for the second side? Modifiers RT, Right side, and LT, Left side, are not allowed on these codes.
ANSWER: Assign CPT 37238, Transcatheter placement of an intravascular stent(s), open or percutaneous, including radiological supervision and interpretation and including angioplasty within the same vessel, when performed; initial vein, and 37239, Transcatheter placement of an intravascular stent(s), ... each additional vein (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure), for the stent placement in the right and left iliac veins. The appending of a modifier (50, RT, LT) would not be appropriate as blood vessels are not considered paired organs.Therefore, one code would be reported for the initial vein and the add-on code would capture the additional vein treated.
Please note, it is important that the medical record documentation identify the location of the stent(s) placed and the vein(s) treated.
Surgery/Musculoskeletal System: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release
CPT Assistant March 2009, Volume 19, Issue 3, page 10
Question: What is the proper code for an endoscopic cubital tunnel release? May code 64718, Neuroplasty and/or transposition; ulnar nerve at elbow or 64719, Neuroplasty and/or transposition; ulnar nerve at wrist, be reported to describe this procedure?
Answer: No. While 64718 describes an open cubital tunnel release, there is no specific CPT code to describe endoscopic cubital tunnel release. It is not appropriate to report open surgical procedure code 64718 or 64719 for an endoscopic procedure as it is not acceptable to report a code for a procedure that is only similar to the actual procedure performed. Instead, code 29999, Unlisted procedure, arthroscopy, should be reported in the case.
Myofascial Flap with Neuroplasty
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Fourth Quarter 2020: Page 8
Question 5: A patient with left cubital tunnel syndrome presented for a left elbow arthroscopic ulnar nerve neuroplasty, ulnar nerve transposition, division of the medial inter-muscular septum and myofascial flap of the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU). Following the neuroplasty and transposition, a myofascial flap was prepared to house the nerve in the new anteriorly transposed position. The flap was elevated off the anterior aspect of the FCU, and the FCU was then sharply elevated from its insertion off of bone of the medial epicondyle creating a bed for the nerve. The nerve was then transposed into the bed formed by the bone and the myofascial tissues were advanced. Is the myofascial flap included in the neuroplasty? If not, what CPT code would be assigned to capture the myofascial flap?
Answer :There is no CPT code that captures an arthroscopic myofascial flap for the ulnar nerve. Therefore, assign the unlisted CPT code 29999, Unlisted procedure, arthroscopy, to capture the myofascial flap of the flexor carpi ulnaris in addition to the code for the neuroplasty. Myofascial flaps are generally not performed with neuroplasty.
Please note, when reporting unlisted codes submission of medical record documentation may be required
CPT: Manos™ Coding Clinic for HCPCS Second Quarter 2012 Page 6
QUESTION 5 How would you code a carpal tunnel release using the MANOS™ system?
It is not done endoscopically, it uses ultrasound guidance for mapping of the surgical site for percutaneous positioning of the device to allow cutting of the ligament. Is CPT code 29848-52, Endoscopy, wrist, surgical, with release of transverse carpal ligament, appropriate? Or would CPT Code 25999, Unlisted procedure, forearm or wrist, be better?
ANSWER Currently, there is no specific CPT code for carpal tunnel release using the MANOS™ system and it would be inappropriate to report CPT code 29848 when according to the operative report no endoscopy was utilized. Report CPT code 64999, Unlisted procedure, nervous system, for the procedure performed utilizing the MANOS™ system.
Cervical Allograft Spacer
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, First Quarter 2015: Page 7
QUESTION 3:Can you provide guidance on how to report a "spacer," which is filled with graft that is inserted into a cervical space? We have received conflicting coding guidance and would like some clarification regarding how to report this procedure.What are the appropriate code(s) for the utilization of a "spacer" allograft inserted into the cervical space?
ANSWER : Report CPT code 20931, Allograft, structural, for spine surgery only, in addition to the primary procedure, for the allograft spacer utilized for the procedure performed.
Modifiers Appended to Unlisted CPT Codes
Coding Clinic for HCPCS, First Quarter 2018: Page 1
Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after May 8, 2018, unless otherwise noted. The Central Office on HCPCS has received several inquiries regarding whether it is appropriate to append a modifier to an unlisted CPT code. Unlisted codes represent an item, service, or procedure that does not have a specific CPT or HCPCS code assignment. When a specific CPT or HCPCS code does not exist, an unlisted code may be reported for the item, service, or procedure provided. One of the problems encountered, however, is that the unlisted CPT code descriptor generally does not describe the specific description of the procedure and/or service performed. Here are some examples of unlisted CPT codes: 64999, Unlisted procedure, nervous system; 32999, Unlisted procedure, lungs and pleura; 49999, Unlisted procedure, abdomen, peritoneum and omentum. Use of modifier(s) Modifiers are utilized to offer additional information about the procedure or service being provided, such as, reporting or indicating that a service or procedure was altered by a specific circumstance but not changed in its definition or code. Because unlisted CPT codes do not describe a specific procedure and/or service, it would be inappropriate to append a modifier to the unlisted CPT code. Please note there is an exception when the unlisted code descriptor specifies a body site. In this instance, only a HCPCS Level II modifier may be appended to the unlisted CPT code. For example, CPT code 27365, Radical resection of tumor, femur or knee. In this instance, an appropriate modifier would be appended to specify laterality. Let us look at the Q&A below for additional clarification of when it is appropriate and inappropriate to use modifiers with an unlisted code.
QUESTION Clarification is needed regarding whether it is appropriate to append a modifier to an unlisted CPT code. There are several CPT Assistants archives, which state that it is inappropriate because the unlisted code does not include descriptor language that specifies a specific service and/or procedure. However, some Q & A's published in AHA's Coding Clinic for HCPCS newsletter advise to append modifiers to some unlisted codes to identify laterality such as RT, Right side. Is it correct to append modifiers to unlisted CPT codes?
ANSWER It would be appropriate to append a HCPCS Level II modifier to identify laterality on specific CPT unlisted codes. Some unlisted codes specify an organ or anatomic site in the code narrative. Some examples are as follows: 19499, Unlisted procedure, breast; 27599, Unlisted procedure, femur or knee; 27899, Unlisted procedure, leg or ankle; 67999, Unlisted procedure, eyelids. In these instances, modifiers RT, Right side, or LT, Left side, can be appended to identify the laterality of the breast or leg. Modifier E1, Upper left eyelid, can be appended to identify the specific eyelid. The use of these modifiers does not alter the meaning of the CPT codes and only identify the specific laterality of the anatomic organ or site. Here are a few examples of when it would be inappropriate to append a modifier to an unlisted code. CPT code 64999, Unlisted procedure, nervous system – It would be inappropriate to append a modifier to this CPT code since the nervous system is not a specific anatomic site nor a designated side. CPT code 29999, Unlisted procedure, arthroscopy – It would be inappropriate to append a modifier to this code since this CPT code identifies a procedure and not a specific anatomic site. The term or code searched for is not present in the article, but information pertinent to this term/code is included. This article matched on 15999